- #1
- 24,775
- 792
Here is the choice for the April-June quarter of 2006:
one by Padmanabhan
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0606061 [Broken]
two by Rovelli
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0604044 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0604064 [Broken]
two by Ashtekar
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0605011 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0602086 [Broken]
two by Baez
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0605087
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0511710
three by Majid
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0604132 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0604130 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0601004 [Broken]
To even things up (make forecasting more difficult) I have bundled recent papers in some cases with earlier ones that we have not considered so far.
=============
Please register your prediction about the impact on future research of these papers. To make it more challenging I have attempted to HANDICAP by bundling papers together.
In the first quarter prediction poll, arivero, Kea, selfAdjoint, and turbo all picked a paper of Padmanabhan which it now turns out is WAY AHEAD of all the others in terms of citations---their pick will very likely prove to have been the most influential when we look back a year from now.
Here is the first quarter forecast thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=116791
I don't want the same thing to happen without a contest this time. So I will BUNDLE one paper of Padma, against two by Ashtekar, and two by Rovelli, and two by Baez, and so on.
In a given bundle, only ONE of the papers needs to be second quarter (April thru June) and the other or others in the bundle can be earlier ones which we didn't already consider, usually related somehow to the recent one.
Please try to evaluate and weigh the bundles against each other and guess what will turn out over the next year or so to be most influential or in other words the MOST IMPORTANT PACKAGE (MIP) in this case
one by Padmanabhan
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0606061 [Broken]
two by Rovelli
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0604044 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0604064 [Broken]
two by Ashtekar
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0605011 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0602086 [Broken]
two by Baez
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0605087
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0511710
three by Majid
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0604132 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0604130 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0601004 [Broken]
To even things up (make forecasting more difficult) I have bundled recent papers in some cases with earlier ones that we have not considered so far.
=============
Please register your prediction about the impact on future research of these papers. To make it more challenging I have attempted to HANDICAP by bundling papers together.
In the first quarter prediction poll, arivero, Kea, selfAdjoint, and turbo all picked a paper of Padmanabhan which it now turns out is WAY AHEAD of all the others in terms of citations---their pick will very likely prove to have been the most influential when we look back a year from now.
Here is the first quarter forecast thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=116791
I don't want the same thing to happen without a contest this time. So I will BUNDLE one paper of Padma, against two by Ashtekar, and two by Rovelli, and two by Baez, and so on.
In a given bundle, only ONE of the papers needs to be second quarter (April thru June) and the other or others in the bundle can be earlier ones which we didn't already consider, usually related somehow to the recent one.
Please try to evaluate and weigh the bundles against each other and guess what will turn out over the next year or so to be most influential or in other words the MOST IMPORTANT PACKAGE (MIP) in this case
Last edited by a moderator: