Normalizing the wave function of a free particle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of the wave function for a free particle, specifically focusing on the use of the Dirac delta function in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore two common methods for normalization: box normalization and delta function normalization. Questions arise about how to apply the delta function approach to a specific wave function given by psi(x) = A*e^ikx + B*e^-ikx.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the normalization process, while others express confusion about the application of the Dirac delta function. There is a mix of attempts to clarify the mathematical steps involved and the specific requirements for normalization in this scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants emphasize the necessity of using the Dirac delta function for normalization, indicating that traditional methods may not apply in this case. There is also mention of the implications of normalization on further calculations, such as reflection and transmission coefficients.

maethros
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Can somebody tell me, how it is possible to normalize the wave function of a free particle using the Dirac delta function?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two methods that are commonly used:
1. Box normalization. Space is assumed to be contained in an LXLXL box.
After calculating, say, a scattering amplitude, taking the limit L-->\infty
gives a ifntie result if done carefully.

2. Delta function normalization <x|x'>=\delta(x-x')/(2\pi)^{3/2}.
 
Meir Achuz said:
There are two methods that are commonly used:
1. Box normalization. Space is assumed to be contained in an LXLXL box.
After calculating, say, a scattering amplitude, taking the limit L-->\infty
gives a ifntie result if done carefully.

2. Delta function normalization <x|x'>=\delta(x-x')/(2\pi)^{3/2}.
How can i use the 2nd one this in this case? I have the wave function: psi(x) = A*e^ikx + B*e^-ikx with k = sqrt(2mE/h^2).
I think I can take A = 1, but then i don't know how to continue.
 
normailization is simple.
u have the wavefunction, all u do is square it and integrate, setting equal to 1
so in ur case, int[-inf to inf] A*e^ikx=A^2*e^2ikx=1
pull A^2 from the integral to get A^2 int[-inf to inf]e^2*ikxdx=1 for the first
1/A^2
 
valtorEN said:
normailization is simple.
u have the wavefunction, all u do is square it and integrate, setting equal to 1
so in ur case, int[-inf to inf] A*e^ikx=A^2*e^2ikx=1
pull A^2 from the integral to get A^2 int[-inf to inf]e^2*ikxdx=1 for the first
1/A^2

Thx, but I know how normalization normally works :rolleyes:

But not in this case: Free Particle and I HAVE TO use the DELTA FUNCTION.
 
Okay, so let me ask you what \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx e^{\imath (k - k&#039;) x} is. Once you figure that one out, I think you could probably normalize the wave function pretty well.
 
maethros said:
How can i use the 2nd one this in this case? I have the wave function: psi(x) = A*e^ikx + B*e^-ikx with k = sqrt(2mE/h^2).
I think I can take A = 1, but then i don't know how to continue.
What are you going to do with the wave function. If you are going to calculate reflection and transmission coefficients, you odn't have to normalize it.
 
Meir Achuz said:
What are you going to do with the wave function. If you are going to calculate reflection and transmission coefficients, you odn't have to normalize it.

I only want to know how I can normalize it using the Dirac delta function. That is all.
I never said that i want to calculate the reflection or transmission coefficient.
 
Your \int |psi|^2 will have four terms. Four each term use
\int exp{ikx-ik'x}=(2pi)^3\delta(k-k').
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K