Why is c even in the equation?

  • Thread starter donkeyhide
  • Start date
  • Tags
    even
In summary: E/c^2. And it is this same m which appears in the energy equation, which means the energy of light (E=hf) is a mass equivalent. In summary, the speed of light enters the equation because it is a universal constant and is related to the energy-mass equivalence through the proportionality constant c^2. This can be demonstrated through experiments involving photons and the conservation of momentum. The units of energy also play a role in understanding why the speed of light is involved in the equation.
  • #1
donkeyhide
10
0
why is "c" even in the equation?

i was hoping someone could explain why light speed even enters the e=mc2 equation. energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. i get that, and what the formula predicts. but why the speed of light? i was never one to go into the mathematics of all of this.

its just one of those things that you read and never really fully answer for yourself, i guess. i have read many books on relativity, and understand some things about it as a whole. but why is it that light-speed squared just happens to work out as the number that gives the right figure to multiply mass against? does it have something to do with the units that are used to calculate energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Originally posted by donkeyhide
i was hoping someone could explain why light speed even enters the e=mc2 equation. energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. i get that, and what the formula predicts. but why the speed of light? i was never one to go into the mathematics of all of this.

its just one of those things that you read and never really fully answer for yourself, i guess. i have read many books on relativity, and understand some things about it as a whole. but why is it that light-speed squared just happens to work out as the number that gives the right figure to multiply mass against? does it have something to do with the units that are used to calculate energy?

It all goes back to the fact that c (the speed of light) is a constant for all observers. becuase of this, measurements of length and time between moving systems have to be adjusted by formulas that contain c (the Lorentz transformations).

Now if you take these formulas to calculate the energy of a moving object (which depends on these measurements) you get a formula that looks like this:

[tex]E = \frac{mc^{2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}[/tex]

Note that if v =0, the formula reduces to

[tex] E=mc^{2}[/tex]

which is the energy equivalence of the object's rest mass.
 
  • #3
There are many books that give a derivation of the E=mc^2 forumla all based upon c as the velocity of light. There is another approach - a global derivation based upon expansion, where c is the expansion velocity of the Hubble sphere (which has the same value as the velocity of light)... accelerations of mass leads to forces, and force times distance is energy - when you calculate the energy required to remove a mass from the universe against this force - vola - you also get E = mc^2
 
  • #4


Originally posted by donkeyhide
i was hoping someone could explain why light speed even enters the e=mc2 equation. ... does it have something to do with the units that are used to calculate energy?

It seems to me that it does have something to do with the units.
Maybe the units do not explain everything but they might help give some understanding.

In any consistent system of units the unit of energy is
always equal to the unit of mass multiplied by the square of
the unit speed

take for example the normal metric system where the energy unit is the joule and the unit mass is the kilogram

the joule is equal to one kilogram multiplied by the square of the unit speed

that is one kilogram x (meter/second)2

So if you have a mass and you want to get an energy quantity you are algebraically required (by the units system) to multiply by the square of some speed.

So suppose Einstein had figured out that the energy content of an object is proportional to the object's inertia but he had not yet discovered that the ratio was c2

he would think: if E is proportional to m, then there must be SOME speed that I can square and multiply m by, to get E. What could that speed be? What speed could give the constant of proportionality?

If this proportion between E and m is a universal proportion then the speed I need must be some universal fundamental speed constant. Well the only universal constant speed I know is c, could it maybe be that?
----------------

I guess the basic help that units give here is to show that if E and m are going to be proportional to each other there must be SOME speed whose square is the constant proportion between them.

This could have been deduced 100 years before Einstein, people have known for as long as they have had energy units that energy units are always equal to the mass unit multiplied by the square of a speed.
Newton could have told you that. Energy (work) = F x d = force x dist
force = mass x accel
force = mass x dist/time2
force x dist = mass x dist2/time2
force x dist = mass x speed2
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Einstein used thought experiments involving photons, so from studying these, one can understand where c, the speed of light, enters the story.

There is one experimental fact you will have to acknowledge; photons carry besides energy (E) also an amount of momentum p=E/c.

Imagine a box with mass M and length L on which no forces work, so the center of gravity will remain fixed. One the left side a photon is emitted and will cause the box to move to the other side. Because of the conservation of momentum the box will move with a velocity v which obeys: Mv=p=E/c -> v=E/Mc. After a time t=L/c the photon will reach the oher side and the box will be moved a distance d=vt.

The center of gravity will be shifted by an amount mL-Md. But wait, because the are no external forces at work the center of gravity must be fixed. So: mL=Md=Mvt=EL/c^2 -> m=E/c^2 or E=mc^2.

So this shows that a photon can be assigned a 'mass' of m=E/c^2...
 

Attachments

  • img64.gif
    img64.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 831
Last edited:

1. Why is c included in the equation?

The variable c is often used in equations as a placeholder for a constant value. This means that its value does not change and can be used to represent a specific number or quantity in the equation.

2. What does c stand for in an equation?

The variable c can stand for various quantities depending on the specific equation. In some cases, it may represent a constant value such as the speed of light or the speed of sound. In other cases, it may represent a coefficient or a constant term in a polynomial equation.

3. Can an equation be solved without using c?

In some cases, an equation may be solvable without using the variable c if it is not necessary for finding the solution. However, in many cases, c is an essential part of the equation and is needed to accurately describe the relationship between variables.

4. Why is c sometimes used with other variables in an equation?

In certain equations, the variable c may be used in combination with other variables to represent a specific relationship between them. For example, in the equation E=mc^2, c is used to represent the speed of light, while m represents mass and E represents energy.

5. Is c always a constant in an equation?

No, c is not always a constant in an equation. In some cases, it may vary depending on the context of the equation. For example, in the equation for the area of a circle, c represents the circumference which can vary depending on the size of the circle.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
874
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
130
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
335
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top