Why can't energy or information go faster than light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why energy and information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Participants explore theoretical implications, causality, and the principles of relativity, engaging in both conceptual and technical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that mass increases as objects approach the speed of light, requiring more energy for acceleration, which raises questions about the speed of information transfer.
  • Others argue that if information could travel faster than light, it would lead to violations of causality, where events could be perceived to occur out of order in different frames of reference.
  • One participant mentions the concept of a speed limit (c) in the context of space-time geometry, suggesting that this limit enforces a trade-off between spatial and temporal motion.
  • Several contributions reference the "Tachyonic Anti-telephone" thought experiment, which illustrates potential paradoxes arising from faster-than-light communication.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of a hypothetical faster-than-light effect that could allow for information transfer without violating causality, but this would challenge the principle of relativity.
  • Some participants express concerns about the clarity and coherence of certain posts, indicating a need for better communication in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the implications of causality and relativity while others challenge the assumptions underlying these arguments. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the possibility of faster-than-light information transfer and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments depend on specific assumptions about the nature of the universe, such as homogeneity and isotropy, which have not been universally accepted or proven. The discussion also highlights the complexity of reconciling theoretical models with observed phenomena.

  • #31
danielhaish said:
I am a little confused

That is clear.

danielhaish said:
t assume that there is two location with difference time frames

That is not.

danielhaish said:
and in each location there is one quant

Nor is that. What is a "quant"?

danielhaish said:
but when you put measure device on one quant it like sending a signal to the past

I understood that! But it is not correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
danielhaish said:
when you put measure device on one quant it like sending a signal to the past that change the wave function of the quant

No, it isn't. The measuring device only affects the thing being measured at the spacetime location of the measurement. It doesn't affect anything to the past.
 
  • #33
@danielhaish I am sorry but your posts simply do not meet our quality standards. I am closing this thread. I don’t know that we will be able to help you at all here. You may want to find a forum in your native language where the others may have a chance to understand what you are asking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K