Forum Rules - PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doc Al
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum Rules
Doc Al
Mentor
Messages
45,578
Reaction score
2,428
Before posting anything, please review the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380".

If you are seeking help with a homework/coursework/textbook-related issue please post your problem in the appropriate forum in our https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=152" area.

All threads in this forum are intended to discuss the scientific content of well-researched models of physics beyond the Standard Models of elementary particle physics and cosmology that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Due to the speculative nature of the subject, not-yet-published papers uploaded to databases like ArXiv or presented at reputable conferences are also acceptable for discussion. (Note that references to such unreviewed sources remain unacceptable in the other subforums dedicated to more established areas of physics.)

This forum deals with theories beyond the Standard Models of elementary particle physics and cosmology. This includes topics such as String, Superstring, Supersymmetry, Quantum Gravity, MOND, etc. Topics dealing with complexities in quantum field theory, relativity, etc., should be posted in those specific forums, not here.

This forum may not be used to propose new ideas or personal theories. Mentors will remove such threads.

Threads that discuss anything other than the mathematics or physics of such models may be locked or moved to a more appropriate forum, at the discretion of the Mentors. Specifically, threads on sociological aspects of research, such as funding priorities or issues of bias and nepotism within academia must be started in the Social Sciences forum; threads on book sales or citation statistics belong either in Social Sciences or General Discussion, depending on the thrust of the OP; threads on prospects for research funding in different specializations should go to Academic & Career Guidance.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
274
Replies
2
Views
224
Replies
0
Views
8K
Replies
60
Views
7K
Back
Top