Uncovering the Mysteries of the h- Particle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Y.
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the credibility of the claims surrounding the h-Particle as reported by Physorg. Participants express skepticism regarding the authenticity of the information, with one user highlighting the lack of verifiable evidence for perpetual motion machines. The consensus indicates that without substantial data and accepted verification, discussions on such topics are deemed inappropriate. The conversation emphasizes the need for rigorous investigation into the claims made.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perpetual motion machines and their theoretical implications.
  • Familiarity with scientific verification processes and peer review standards.
  • Knowledge of basic physics principles related to energy conservation.
  • Awareness of reputable scientific sources and their credibility.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of perpetual motion and why they violate the laws of thermodynamics.
  • Explore the peer review process in scientific publishing to understand how claims are validated.
  • Investigate historical claims of perpetual motion machines and their outcomes.
  • Learn about the role of skepticism in scientific discourse and how it fosters rigorous inquiry.
USEFUL FOR

Scientists, physics students, skeptics of pseudoscience, and anyone interested in the validation of scientific claims will benefit from this discussion.

Physics news on Phys.org
Two comments:

“One of these days in your travels, a guy is going to come up to you and show you a nice brand-new deck of cards on which the seal is not yet broken, and this guy is going to offer to bet you that he can make the Jack of Spades jump out of the deck and squirt cider in your ear. But, son, do not bet this man, for as sure as you are standing there, you are going to end up with an earful of cider.”
Damon Runyan in Guys and Dolls

www.psychoceramic.com[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So it's a fake? I thought Physorg was a reputable source. Last time I visit that website.
 
I have no way of knowing it's a fake. That's the beauty of these claims - there's no way of checking them (say, close your eyes and give me change for this $1000 bill - don't look). But it sure smells like one. That particular arrangement has shown up before.
 
Until there is a verified, accepted perpetual machine, any discussion of such a thing is not allowed on PF.

Future posts and threads on this will be immediately deleted.

Zz.
 
Daniel Y. said:
So it's a fake? I thought Physorg was a reputable source. Last time I visit that website.
Well, as Markus Zahn indicated, it needs investigation. Not enough detail to understand the circuitry.

At the moment, there is insufficient information with which to draw a definitive conclusion.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Are There Any Theories for the Mystery Particle at 28 GeV?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Diminishing returns from particle accelerators
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate Is the Mystery Particle Discovery Just Media Hype?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Graduate Particle distribution in the longitudinal beam dynamics in accelerator
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Graduate Why do the proton and electron have equal and opposite electric charge?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Graduate Experiment Suggests New Particle
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
High School Sabine Hossenfelder on the search for new particles
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
13K
Insights How Quantum Information Theory Solves “the only mystery” of Quantum Mechanics
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Physics Rewarding career after physics graduation - Mysterious money?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad Virtual particles and Heisenberg
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K