Calculating Photon Detection in Radiation Physics with 30 Degree Incident Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Andreas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the number of photons detected after passing through a 2 mm thick copper plate at a 30-degree incident angle. The formula used for calculating the number of detected photons is N = N0 * e^(mu * L'), where L' is the effective path length adjusted for the angle of incidence. For a 30-degree angle, the path length is determined to be 4 mm, calculated as L' = 2 mm / sin(30). This adjustment is crucial for accurate photon detection calculations in radiation physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear attenuation coefficients in radiation physics
  • Familiarity with exponential decay formulas
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine
  • Basic principles of photon interactions with matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the linear attenuation coefficient for copper at 100 keV
  • Study the effects of varying incident angles on photon detection
  • Learn about advanced radiation detection techniques and equipment
  • Explore the implications of photon energy on attenuation in different materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, radiation safety professionals, and students studying radiation interactions and detection methods in materials science.

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
The problem: 1000 photons all having an energy of 100 keV hits a copper plate 2 mm thick. How many of these photons can be detected on the other side by a detector that absorbs all radiation? The incident angle is 30 degrees with respect to the plane of the copper plate.

If the angle had been 90 degrees I would have had no problem calculating this -- it would just have been N = N0*e^(mu*L), where N0 is the number of incoming photons, mu the linear attenuation coefficient, and L the thickness of the copper plate. But now that it says 30 degrees, I'm out of ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The path length is greater since the beam is not striking the face at 90 degress, just figure out the correct path length through the 2mm thick slab.
 
Thanks. I forgot that the photons are assumed either to be absorbed fully by the material, or to pass through without any interaction. So L should be be replaced by L'=4 mm, right? (That is, L'= 2mm/sin30).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
749
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K