Induction Proof that 2^n > n^2 for n>=5

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtl42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality \(2^n > n^2\) for \(n \geq 5\) using mathematical induction. Participants are exploring the necessary steps and conditions for the proof, particularly focusing on the base case and the induction hypothesis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to establish the base case and the induction hypothesis. There are attempts to clarify the steps required to prove \(2^{k+1} \geq (k+1)^2\) based on the assumption that \(2^k \geq k^2\). Some express confusion about how to transition from \(2^n \geq 2n + 1\) to the desired inequality.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants offering insights and clarifications on the induction process. Some have provided algebraic manipulations and reasoning to support the proof, while others are questioning specific steps and assumptions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of proving specific inequalities and the conditions under which they hold true, particularly for values of \(n\) starting from 5. There is also mention of the need to clarify terms such as RHS (Right Hand Side) and the implications of certain algebraic expressions.

dtl42
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that [tex]2^{x} \geq x^{2}[/tex]
[tex]\forall x\geq5[/tex]


Homework Equations


[tex]2^{k} \geq x^{k}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I multiplied both sides by 2, then added to factor the RHS, and eventually got to the point where I just need to prove [tex]2^{n} \geq 2n+1[/tex] by induction also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For induction, you have to prove the base case. Then you assume your induction hypothesis, which in this case is 2n >= n2. After that you want to prove that it is true for n + 1, i.e. that 2n+1 >= (n+1)2. You will use the induction hypothesis in the proof (the assumption that 2n >= n2).
 
Last edited:
You know that [tex]2^{n} \geq 2n+1[/tex] for [tex]n \geq 5[/tex]. Follow Steelphantoms template for an inductive proof and take it to home plate.
 
How do I know that [tex] 2^{n} \geq 2n+1[/tex] for
[tex] n \geq 5[/tex]

That's what else I need to prove by induction.
 
No, Dylanette's point was that you KNOW "[itex]2^k\ge 2k+1[/itex]" for some k and now want to prove that [itex]2^{k+1}\ge 2(k+1)+ 1[/itex]". (I prefer to use "k" rather than "n" again just to avoid this kind of confusion.)

If [itex]2^k\ge 2k+1[/itex], then [itex]2^{k+1}= 2(2^k)\ge 2(2k+ 1)= 4k+ 2[/itex].
Since you want 2(k+ 1)+ 1= 2k+ 3, try rewriting that "4k": 4k+ 2= 2k+ 2+ 2k so you need to be able to say "[itex]2k\ge 1[/itex]". That's pretty obvious, isn't it?
 
Halls, re-read his original problem, he has to prove that [tex]2^{k+1} \ge (k+1)^2[/tex] assuming that [tex]2^k \ge k^2[/tex]
 
Okay, I reread his post. What he said was "I got to the point where I just need to prove [itex]2^n \ge 2n+ 1[/itex] by induction also".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:blushing::blushing::blushing:

oops, I should take my own advice, my bad.

:blushing::blushing::blushing:
 
what does RHS stand for? "added to factor the RHS"
 
  • #10
RHS=Right Hand Side (of the equation).
 
  • #11
im super stuck. don't know how to get to the 2^n > 2n+1 step that the posters are talking about. I know I have to use 2^k=k^2 and also that 2^k+1 = 2(2^k).
 
  • #12
It's not clear to me either (now, five months after the original post). I arrive at a different point to complete the proof.

You want to show that [itex]2^x\ge x^2[/itex] for [itex]x\ge 5[/itex].

First, when x= 5, 25= 32> 25= 52 so it is true for x= 5. Now, suppose [itex]2^k\ge k^2[/itex] for some k. We need to show that it follows that [itex]2^{k+1}\ge (k+ 1)^2[/itex]. As you say, [itex]2^{k+1}= 2(2^k)\ge 2(k^2)[/itex]. The proof will be complete if we can show that [itex]2k^2\ge (k+ 1)^2[/itex], for [itex]k\ge 5[/itex]. A little algebra show that is equivalent to proving that [itex](k-1)^2\ge 2[/itex] which is certainly true for [itex]k\ge 5[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Notice that as long as [tex]k \ge 5[/tex] it is true that

[tex] k^2 > 2k+1[/tex]

(examine the parabola [tex]k^2 - 2k - 1[/tex] to see this)

The induction anchor is that [tex]2^k \ge k^2[/tex] for some [tex]k \ge 5[/tex]. Then

[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> 2^{k+1} & = 2 \left(2^k\right) \ge 2\left(k^2\right)\\<br /> & = 2k^2 = k^2 + k^2\\<br /> & > k^2 + 2k + 1 <br /> & = (k+1)^2 \\<br /> 2^{k+1} \ge (k+1)^2<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
hi . If possible, please explain why :

k^2 > 2k +1

I don't understand it . :confused:
 
  • #15
As statdad said, look at [itex]y= k^2- 2k- 1= k^2- 2k+ 1- 2= (k+1)^2-2[/itex]. The graph of that is a parabola with vertex at (-1, -2). For x> -1 y is increasing and when x= 2, [itex]y= (5-1)^2- 2= 14> 0[/itex]. So for k> 5, [itex]k^2- 2k- 1> 0[/itex] and thus [itex]k^2> 2k+ 1[/itex].
 
  • #16
HallsofIvy said:
As statdad said, look at [itex]y= k^2- 2k- 1= k^2- 2k+ 1- 2= (k+1)^2-2[/itex]. The graph of that is a parabola with vertex at (-1, -2). For x> -1 y is increasing and when x= 2, [itex]y= (5-1)^2- 2= 14> 0[/itex]. So for k> 5, [itex]k^2- 2k- 1> 0[/itex] and thus [itex]k^2> 2k+ 1[/itex].

thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K