Heisenbergs Uncertainty for light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter duffbeerforme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Uncertainty
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the implications of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle as it relates to photons, specifically addressing the apparent contradiction of knowing both the velocity and position of a photon. Participants explore the nuances of the uncertainty principle, its application to different observables, and the nature of measuring properties of photons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how it is possible to know both the velocity and position of a photon, suggesting that if velocity is known exactly, the photon must be everywhere at once.
  • Another participant clarifies that the uncertainty principle relates to position and momentum, and posits that it is possible to measure a photon's momentum and energy precisely, leading to a specific relation between energy and momentum.
  • A different participant notes that the uncertainty relation applies only to observables that do not commute, indicating that it applies to position and momentum but not to position and velocity.
  • This participant also introduces the idea that the momentum of a photon is not precisely defined but rather exists as a distribution of momenta, suggesting that the position where a photon hits a detector is also not a precise point but a cloud of possible points.
  • Another participant discusses the absence of a velocity operator in quantum mechanics, suggesting that while one could define a velocity operator, it would commute with the momentum operator, complicating the application of the uncertainty principle.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of measuring a photon's position, as detecting it may destroy the photon, making successive measurements of position problematic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the uncertainty principle to photons, particularly regarding the relationship between position, momentum, and velocity. There is no consensus on how these concepts interact in the context of photon behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in measuring properties of photons, including the implications of measurement on the state of the photon and the nature of observables in quantum mechanics. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainties and assumptions about the definitions and interactions of these physical quantities.

duffbeerforme
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was just wondering if Heisenbergs uncertainty principal is about position and velocity (or energy and time),.. then how come we can know that a photon travels at light speed (its velocity) exactly and also know that it hit some detector (its position).
If we know the velocity exactly then the light must be everywhere at the same time right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
duffbeerforme said:
Hi, I was just wondering if Heisenbergs uncertainty principal is about position and velocity (or energy and time),.. then how come we can know that a photon travels at light speed (its velocity) exactly and also know that it hit some detector (its position).
If we know the velocity exactly then the light must be everywhere at the same time right?
To be precise the uncertainty principle which you're referrring to relates the uncertainty between position and momentum. It seems to me (although I'm not 100% sure) that since its quite possible to measure the momentum p of the photon and its energy E to arbitrary precision (i.e. the energy operator commutes with the position operator) then one can deduce the precise value of the momentum. The relation is p = (E/c^2)c = E/c and therefore c = E/p.

Pete
 
I'm not an expert, but I think I can answer this one.

As the person above me said, the uncertainty relation doesn't apply to any two observables you can think of. It only applies to observables that don't "commute". So it would apply to position and momentum, but not to position and velocity.

If you consider the position and momentum of a photon, you will see that neither variable is known precisely. The momentum of any given photon is actually a cloud of momenta. So, let's say you think you have photons of a given wavelength (and therefore, a given momentum). It turns out that what you actually have is a bunch of different wavelengths that differ slightly from each other. Think of the photon as a bunch of waves with different wavelengths grouped together in a "wave packet" like here:
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~bds2/ltsn/Edinburgh/wave/index.html

Likewise, the point where the photon contacts the detector is not a precise point but is a small cloud of points.

The smaller the position cloud is, the bigger the momentum cloud will be, and vice-versa.
 
Usaf Moji said:
I'm not an expert, but I think I can answer this one.

As the person above me said, the uncertainty relation doesn't apply to any two observables you can think of. It only applies to observables that don't "commute". So it would apply to position and momentum, but not to position and velocity.
There is no such thing as a velocity operator and as such there is no observable corresponding to such an operator. I guess you could define a velocity operator by using the expression p = mv and rewrite it as v = p/m. Since momentum has an operator and m is a constant then there doesn't seem be be a problem with it. However it is obvious from this definition that the velocity operator commutes with the momentum operator.

As far as measuring position as a function of time and deducing the speed from those measurements then I don't see how that is possible since detecting the position of a photon involves destroying the photon. Two successive measurements of position would then seem to be impossible.

Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K