Is Gravity the Pure-Vacuum SINGULAR state?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes absorb three-dimensional information but only emit two-dimensional data, aligning with Hawking's findings on the Information Paradox. For every three-dimensional bit of information that falls into a black hole, only two bits are returned, suggesting black holes act as low-energy dimensional down-converters. The discussion also highlights that photons entering black holes lose energy, becoming lower-dimensional entities, which implies they are entangled with the electromagnetic vacuum. Additionally, the conversation touches on the nature of gravitational waves and their relationship to different dimensional forces, proposing that black holes emit light at reduced frequencies, potentially rendering them invisible at close range. This phenomenon may explain the presence of dark matter halos around galaxies, which are undetectable from our proximity within the Milky Way.
Olias
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
May be absorbing 3-D information, but they can only emit 2-D information.

According to Hawking recent expose on 'Information Paradox', the result conforms to the reality that Blackholes at all Galactic cores are really Nature's Parametric Low Energy Dimensional Down-Converters.

For every 3-D bit (three 'lengths' of anything: E = mc^2 ) of infalling information absorbed into the Horizon of a BH, only 'two-bits/lengths' are returned away from the Horizon.

The 2-D vacuum of space consists of expanding 'Lengths/bits'.

The initial state of Quantum Origin, 'pure state', has a definate paramiter and evolves along a path integral that maintains its state, ie remains forever a pure state, according to accepted Quantum Theory.

But Hawking Radiation equates to the Pure state 'flipping' from a pure state to a mixed state, what I term as a Quantum Flip! as opposed to a Quantum Jump?

The difference being the Photon-Electron interaction occurs in Spacetime 3+1 Dimensions, a photon of hv energy remains so before and after interactions.

But a photon of hv energy falling into a BH does not retain its hv value, at least 1/3 of its energy remains behind (enclosed) within the Blackhole, thus the photon is re-scaled to a low-energy/lesser-dimensional physical quantity.

One can almost state that photons are 'entangled' to the Electromagnetic Vacuum, by the slowed down environment of Blackhole Horizons, which would make Blackholes High-energy thermal absorbers, and Low-energy thermal Emmiters, simply because of the 3-D directional rate known as Entropy :rolleyes:

Next question is can Gravitational Waves be 'fixed' into the location of a 1-D background, or conversely is Gravity the Pure-Vacuum SINGULAR state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Olias said:
Next question is can Gravitational Waves be 'fixed' into the location of a 1-D background, or conversely is Gravity the Pure-Vacuum SINGULAR state?

Can we stretch our imagination both sides of the 3D domain?

Between 0D and 1D the force is gravity. Between 1D and 2D the force is the nuclear strong force. Between 2D and 3D the force is electromagnetic. Between 3D and 4D the force is the weak nuclear force.

The 1D universe is ruled by quanta of spacetime. The 2D universe is ruled by a continuous field of 2D space. The 3D universe is ruled by quanta of energy. The 4D universe is ruled by quanta of mass.
 
Antonio Lao said:
Can we stretch our imagination both sides of the 3D domain?

Between 0D and 1D the force is gravity. Between 1D and 2D the force is the nuclear strong force. Between 2D and 3D the force is electromagnetic. Between 3D and 4D the force is the weak nuclear force.

The 1D universe is ruled by quanta of spacetime. The 2D universe is ruled by a continuous field of 2D space. The 3D universe is ruled by quanta of energy. The 4D universe is ruled by quanta of mass.

It may be that Blackholes absorb Photon-Energy, but actually Emit Light at a reduced frequency, so much so that it becomes Invisible at close quarters, Dark.

The Luminocity function for observing far away Galaxies shows that all Galaxies have a Halo of invisible Matter, this should not be detectable at close range, for instance we cannot detect the Dark Matter within the Milky way because of our Proximity.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top