Why Does e Appear in Nature So Often?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical constant e and its frequent appearance in nature, particularly in exponential equations in physics. Participants express confusion over the intuitive understanding of e, questioning its significance and the lack of straightforward proofs in introductory calculus texts. A key point highlighted is the integral relationship, specifically that the area under the inverse curve from 1 to e equals 1, which serves as a fundamental definition of e. The conversation emphasizes the need for clearer explanations of why e is prevalent in natural phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, particularly integrals and derivatives.
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical constants, specifically e and pi.
  • Experience with physics equations involving exponential growth or decay.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the significance of the integral definition of e in calculus.
  • Explore the applications of e in natural logarithms and exponential growth models.
  • Study the relationship between e and other mathematical constants like pi.
  • Investigate real-world phenomena modeled by exponential equations in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of calculus and their applications in natural sciences.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
oops there's an extra m in my topic title, I was going for why e. :wink:

I believe most the the exponential equations in physics come from the fact that a^[f(x)] = a^[f(x)] * lna * df/dx but the book I had in my first calculus class didn't had a proof for that.

Does anybody have one? And most importantly, why e? Does that number represent anything special; is it a certain ratio like pi or anything like that? It really seem to be coming out of nowhere for me. The only definitions I've seen are all unintuitive: "e is defined as the integral from there to there of this" or "e is the number such that [such and such]", etc. But why does it appear in nature so often??

(If you know a similar thread exists, tell me because I didn't find one.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that there is significance in this relationship

1 = \int ^e _1 \frac {dx} x

Edit, fixed typo, now I'll add a bit of verbiage.

Think about that, the area under the inverse curve between 1 and e is equal to 1. This is a pretty fundamental definition of e.
 
Last edited:
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K