- 4,426
- 327
Title: Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement?
Abstract: Probably not
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2832
Abstract: Probably not
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2832
The discussion centers on the paper titled "Explaining Apparent Superluminal Neutrino Speeds as Quantum Weak Measurement," authored by Sir Michael Berry, a prominent figure in quantum measurement theory. Participants express enthusiasm for the abstract's unconventional style while debating the appropriateness of the term "superluminal." The consensus suggests that the paper's acceptance for publication is likely due to Berry's established reputation and the conventional nature of the paper's content. Overall, the conversation highlights the intersection of humor and serious scientific discourse.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the nuances of scientific publication and the implications of advanced quantum theories.
billiards said:epic. but "superluminal"? Yeah i get it, but it seems a bit obtuse.
billiards said:It reminds me of an exam question that some philosophy student got full marks for ...
Q: Define risk.
A: this
Jack21222 said:That's brilliant! I hope it gets accepted for publication like that.