Explaining Apparent Superluminal Neutrino Speeds as Quantum Weak Measurement

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Abstract
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper titled "Explaining Apparent Superluminal Neutrino Speeds as Quantum Weak Measurement," authored by Sir Michael Berry, a prominent figure in quantum measurement theory. Participants express enthusiasm for the abstract's unconventional style while debating the appropriateness of the term "superluminal." The consensus suggests that the paper's acceptance for publication is likely due to Berry's established reputation and the conventional nature of the paper's content. Overall, the conversation highlights the intersection of humor and serious scientific discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum measurement theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of superluminal speeds
  • Knowledge of the contributions of Sir Michael Berry to physics
  • Awareness of academic publication standards in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "quantum weak measurement" techniques and implications
  • Explore the "Berry phase" and its significance in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the criteria for publication in scientific journals
  • Study the concept of superluminal speeds in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the nuances of scientific publication and the implications of advanced quantum theories.

Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,426
Reaction score
327
Title: Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement?

Abstract: Probably not

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2832
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hahaha, that's awesome.
 
That's brilliant! I hope it gets accepted for publication like that.
 
hahahahahaha that's epic!
 
epic. but "superluminal"? Yeah i get it, but it seems a bit obtuse.
 
Short, yes, but I see room for improvement.
 
It reminds me of an exam question that some philosophy student got full marks for ...
Q: Define risk.
A: this
 
billiards said:
epic. but "superluminal"? Yeah i get it, but it seems a bit obtuse.

That's the standard adjective to use in this case. Not obtuse at all.
 
  • #10
billiards said:
It reminds me of an exam question that some philosophy student got full marks for ...
Q: Define risk.
A: this

Or even, http://www.studential.com/bio/getps.asp?ps=1492". Philosophers seem to be very risky individuals.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Jack21222 said:
That's brilliant! I hope it gets accepted for publication like that.

It might very well get accepted like that. Note that the first author is Sir Michael Berry from Bristol Univerist, (of "Berry phase" fame); so it wasn't written by some unknown PhD Student.
Berry is one of the leading experts of the world when it comes to quantum measurement theory, and the rest of the paper is quite conventionall when it comes to how it is written.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K