Does quantum field fills every single piece of the universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter No-where-man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Quantum Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The quantum field permeates the entire universe, leaving no regions of absolute emptiness or "holes." This conclusion is supported by the concept of vacuum fluctuations, which indicate that virtual particles continuously emerge and vanish within the quantum field. The Higgs field, as referenced in the discussion, is fundamental in providing mass to particles through their interactions with it. Therefore, the notion of absolute nothingness is inconsistent with quantum mechanics, as every part of space is filled with quantum fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Higgs field and its role in particle physics
  • Knowledge of vacuum fluctuations and virtual particles
  • Basic concepts of field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of vacuum fluctuations in quantum field theory
  • Study the role of the Higgs field in mass generation
  • Explore the concept of virtual particles and their effects on physical matter
  • Investigate field theory and its applications in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of particle physics and field theory.

No-where-man
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
I mean I read there is no such thing as absolute nothingness (which is logical), you can't create something from nothing.
But does it mean that quantum field fills every single piece of the universe which means there are not "holes", actually in quantum field that are completely empty?
Big thanks for the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what people often write, there is a probability of some quantum activity happening throughout the universe.

Eg. Pair creation and annihilation. This happens on a bed of quantum fields rather than coming from a |0> state.

Though, I have no real guess as to what happens inside a black hole
 
No-where-man said:
I mean I read there is no such thing as absolute nothingness (which is logical), you can't create something from nothing.
But does it mean that quantum field fills every single piece of the universe which means there are not "holes", actually in quantum field that are completely empty?
Big thanks for the answer.

Wow! You're lucky that the notion that there is no such thing as absolute nothingness is logical to you! :D
To answer your question, I'm pretty sure the answer is yes. Referring to this article,
http://physics.about.com/od/quantumphysics/f/HiggsField.htm, I quote

"He proposed that this field existed throughout all of space and that particles gained their mass by interacting with it."

Also vacuum fluctuations don't make sense if there are regions where the fields are 'restricted' from.
 
eightsquare said:
Wow! You're lucky that the notion that there is no such thing as absolute nothingness is logical to you! :D
To answer your question, I'm pretty sure the answer is yes. Referring to this article,
http://physics.about.com/od/quantumphysics/f/HiggsField.htm, I quote

"He proposed that this field existed throughout all of space and that particles gained their mass by interacting with it."

Also vacuum fluctuations don't make sense if there are regions where the fields are 'restricted' from.

Ok, big thanks for the link.
 
No-where-man said:
you can't create something from nothing

Well, nothing is a tricky term in QM and Lawrence Krauss does not entirely agree:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46sKeycH3bE


But does it mean that quantum field fills every single piece of the universe which means there are not "holes", actually in quantum field that are completely empty?

Depends what you mean by “fills” and “holes”... it’s like a “bubbling brew” of virtual particles, popping in and out of existence, so fast that you can never detect them, hence empty space is not completely empty. The fact is; the weight of your body comes mostly from the “borrowed energy” of virtual particles because the quarks (the building blocks of protons and neutrons in the atomic nuclei) weigh almost nothing (maybe a perfect ‘remedy’ for overweight people – “It’s only virtual!” :smile:).
250px-Quark_structure_proton.svg.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3xLuZNKhlY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECkG_JdodMA


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Wilczek
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
892
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K