Tell me im wrong SEMI-INVERTED VORTEX

  • Thread starter Thread starter TOROIDAL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vortex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of a "semi-inverted vortex," proposed as a third vortex to explain atomic, stellar, and galactic behaviors. The original poster seeks input from knowledgeable individuals to explore this idea further. However, a participant immediately dismisses the concept, indicating disagreement. The conversation highlights a clash between innovative theories and established scientific understanding. Overall, the proposal remains unvalidated within the academic community.
TOROIDAL
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
tell me I am wrong " SEMI-INVERTED VORTEX "

I have discovered a third vortex which explains the strange products and behaviours of atoms, stars and galaxy's, I am not an academic, but i would really like to discuss this with anyone, especialy if they know what their talking about
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, you're wrong.

- Warren
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top