Solve SHM Eqn Problem: Max Energy Transformation

  • Thread starter DDS
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Shm
In summary: You have x(t), which is a function of t, so you want to find PE as a function of t. How do you do that?You are using the equation 1/2 k x^2, where x is the displacement from equilibrium. So, in order to get PE as a function of t, you need to plug in the given x(t) into the equation. This will give you PE as a function of t, since x(t) is a function of t. Then, you can take the derivative of PE with respect to t to get the rate of change of PE, which is equal to the rate of change of KE. From there, you can find the maximum value of this
  • #1
DDS
171
0
A mass on a spring with a constant of 3.76 N/m vibrates, with its position given by the equation x = (4.55 cm) cos(3.70t rad/s). During the first cycle, for 0<t<1.70 s, when is the potential energy of the system changing most rapidly into kinetic energy? There are two solutions, enter both with the smaller one first.

B)What is the maximum rate of energy transformation?

I have taken the square of the function given, then i have found the derivate of the sqaured function. I then set the derivate equal to zero in order to find my max and min but i get the wrong answer.

As for b i have no clue where to even start

ANy help would be extremely appriciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
DDS said:
I have taken the square of the function given, then i have found the derivate of the sqaured function. I then set the derivate equal to zero in order to find my max and min but i get the wrong answer.
You need to find where the rate of change of PE is maximum, not where the PE is maximum.
 
  • #3
How would i go about doing so, this is a very confusing problem at least to me. The only thing i can think of is the slope of the graph, so where the slope being the steepest that would be the greatest rate of change.

How would i go about solving this problem??
 
  • #4
DDS said:
How would i go about doing so, this is a very confusing problem at least to me. The only thing i can think of is the slope of the graph, so where the slope being the steepest that would be the greatest rate of change.

How would i go about solving this problem??

You know the energy is conserved, so whatever kinetic energy is "lost" is converted to potential and vice versa. If you write the kinetic anergy, and take its derivative with respect to time, that is the rate of change of kinetic energy. It will be a function of time. You can find the maximum of that function in the usual way by finding where its slope (derivative) is zero.
 
  • #5
DDS said:
How would i go about doing so, this is a very confusing problem at least to me. The only thing i can think of is the slope of the graph, so where the slope being the steepest that would be the greatest rate of change.

How would i go about solving this problem??
You were on the right track. If you write the potential energy ([itex]1/2 k x^2[/itex]) as a function of time (as I think you were trying to do by "squaring" the position function) then you can find its rate of change. (Which is of course it's slope, if you graphed it.) To find where that function has its minimum, take its derivative. (Note: Where the PE decreases fastest is where the KE increases fastest.)

(This is equivalent to OlderDan's suggestion; I just wanted to tie it into what I thought you were doing. Writing the KE as a function of time, as he suggests, may make it easier for you to grasp.)
 
  • #6
Ihave grouped everyones suggestions and have gotten to this stage:

I have found that

2wt=N(pi)
t= N(pi)/ 2w

i have arbitrarely pluged in vlaues for pie to find times between my given domain, thus i have resulted with these solutions:

n(0)=0
n(1)=0.424
n(2)=0.848
n(3)=1.27
n(4)=1.69

if i plug in 5 for n i get a time that is to large for my interval thus these are the for possible times. However i have tried each combination of these times and they do no produce the right answer.

Can sumone please help me solve this problem?
 
  • #7
Is there someone who can help me from here?
 
  • #8
DDS said:
I have found that

2wt=N(pi)
t= N(pi)/ 2w
Show how you obtained this result.
 
  • #9
y=(Acoswt)^2
y prime= 2 Acoswt + (-sinwt)w =0
through an identity i re wrote it in the form:

2sinwt + coswt=sin2wt=0

sin2wt=0
2wt=N(pi)
t= N(pi)/ 2w

thats the jist of it, now from my equation for t i did what i hsowed a few posts previous,

n(0)=0
n(1)=0.424
n(2)=0.848
n(3)=1.27
n(4)=1.69

i attempted to plug in the values in all possible combinations and i got the answer wrong.

What do i do from here?
 
  • #10
DDS said:
y=(Acoswt)^2
y prime= 2 Acoswt + (-sinwt)w =0
through an identity i re wrote it in the form:

2sinwt + coswt=sin2wt=0
What you seem to be doing (as was pointed out before) is finding the maximum of the PE by (trying to) set its derivative to zero. But that's not the problem. (That's how you find the maximum PE, but that's not the question.)

Start over. Find an expression for the KE as a function of time. (Use conservation of energy.) Then find the rate of change of the KE. That's the function you must maximize.
 
  • #11
So i would have to find the derivative of

1/2mv^2...is there an easier way to solve this problem because i am so discourages now, i did all this work for nothing>?
 
  • #12
DDS said:
...i did all this work for nothing>?
Not for nothing. It is a necessary step, you just stopped too soon.

Hint: KE = Total Energy - PE

Or you can just realize that [itex]d(KE)/dt = - d(PE)/dt[/itex].

Can you write the PE as a function of t?
 
  • #13
i think you can but i am not sure how to.

I seem to be mentaly fixed on the material i have gone through that i don't know how to manipoulate it to get to where i have to go
 
  • #14
Well... what possessed you to square the function given and take its derivative?

Hint: Spring potential energy is given by [itex]1/2 k x^2[/itex], where x is the displacement from equilibrium. You are given x(t). Use it.
 
  • #15
well i squared it due to what you explained :

im know 1/2kx^2 and i am given x so i plug in x into my equation.. and i took the derivate because i know i have to.

but are you saying for me to plug in times bewtween the given interval??

because what i am interpreting from you telling me to use x(t)
that would mean that i would plug in values of t into my position equation.

That doesn't make sense to me seeing as how we are looking for time when the change is the greatest
 
  • #16
DDS said:
well i squared it due to what you explained :

im know 1/2kx^2 and i am given x so i plug in x into my equation.. and i took the derivate because i know i have to.
If you found PE, then took the derivative, you'd have d(PE)/dt. Good! Since d(KE)/dt = -d(PE)/dt, you should have an expression for d(KE)/dt.

Now write that expression as a function of t. (Don't set it equal to zero!)

That's what you need to maximize. (You'll need to take its derivative. Which involves the 2nd derivative of the PE.)
 
  • #17
y=(Acoswt)^2
y prime= 2 Acoswt + (-sinwt)w =0

so as you a said ( am i doing this correctly??)

y prime = - 2 Acoswt + (-sinwt)w is this an expression for d(KE)/dt. ??)

and if it is where do i take it from here
 
  • #18
DDS said:
y=(Acoswt)^2
You want an expression for spring PE:
[itex]\mbox{PE} = 1/2 k x^2 = 1/2 k A^2 \cos^2 \omega t[/itex]
y prime= 2 Acoswt + (-sinwt)w =0
Realize that the derivative of [itex]\cos^2 \omega t[/itex] is [itex]-2 \omega \cos \omega t \sin \omega t[/itex], not [itex]2 \cos \omega t - \sin \omega t[/itex]. (I assume you are just writing it wrongly?)

so as you a said ( am i doing this correctly??)
See my correction above.

y prime = - 2 Acoswt + (-sinwt)w is this an expression for d(KE)/dt. ??)
Once you get the correct expression for d(PE)/dt, then yes, -d(PE)/dt will equal d(KE)/dt.

and if it is where do i take it from here
You find the maxima of that function just like any other.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
So is my correct derivative this:

-2coswtsinwt

and thus my term for KE is just: 2coswtsinwt and then i use this equation to find the maxima, and just to calrify, what you mean by maxima is set it equal to zero and find the roots. Because if so I am a littel consfused as to how i would find the maxima of such a function
 
  • #20
As I stated in the last post, the formula for PE is: [itex]\mbox{PE} = 1/2 k x^2 = 1/2 k A^2 \cos^2 \omega t[/itex]

Thus:
[itex]d({KE})/dt = -d({PE})/dt = -1/2 k A^2(-2 \omega \cos \omega t \sin \omega t) = k A^2 \omega \cos \omega t \sin \omega t[/itex]
This is what you must find the maxima of. To find the maxima, treat it as any other function: Set its derivative equal to zero. (Before taking the derivative, simplify using a trig identity.)
 
  • #21
SO just to make sure before i move onto solve this problem:

i must take the dervative of my KE term which is :

KA^2wcoswtsinwt

once i have its derivative , set it equal to zero and solve, once i solve i should get the times at which the change is most rapid. ( and just to clarifiy, we are still working on part A of the question right??)
 
  • #22
Right. (Please simplify that expression first. And call it the rate of change of KE.) And remember, setting the derivative equal to zero finds both maxima and minima, so you have to check. Yep, still on part A.
 
  • #23
would i use the identity of

2sinwt+coswt=sin2wt=o becuase i am not familiar with what identity i would use to simply the problem?
 
  • #24
I assume you meant to write: [itex]2 \sin \omega t \cos \omega t = \sin 2 \omega t[/itex]. (Watch those + signs!) That's the one to use.
 
  • #25
So is my derivative of the rate of change of Ke this:

-w^2*2A*sinwt*coswt
 
  • #26
How did you get that? Again, first simplify the function using that trig identity, then take the derivative.
 
  • #27
The only thing i can think of simplifying the eqatuion would be to due this

KA^2wcoswtsinwtcoswt

but i don't see how that's simplifying it that much
 
  • #28
Realize that:
[itex]\cos \omega t \sin \omega t = \sin \omega t \cos \omega t = (1/2) \sin 2 \omega t[/itex].
 
  • #29
so it would just be KA^2 1/2sin2wt ?
 
  • #30
DDS said:
so it would just be KA^2 1/2sin2wt ?
You dropped a few omegas.
 
  • #31
wKA^2 1/2wsin2wt
 
  • #32
DDS said:
wKA^2 1/2wsin2wt
Now you have too many. Take the expression given in #20 and plug in the substitution given in #28.
 
  • #33
KA^2 1/2wsin2wt
 
  • #34
OK. Keep going.
 
  • #35
so now if i take the derivative of this i get:

K2A w^2cost
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
970
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
419
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top