Good paper(s) on Bell's theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Edgardo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell's theorem Theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for papers on Bell's theorem, exploring various interpretations and explanations of the theorem and its implications in quantum mechanics. Participants share their experiences with accessing these papers and suggest additional resources for understanding the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recommends a specific paper by Greenberger et al. as a good explanation of Bell's theorem, particularly highlighting its appendix.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty accessing the recommended paper due to paywall issues.
  • Several participants contribute additional paper titles related to Bell's theorem, including works by Hardy, Kwiat, Mermin, and Mattuck.
  • One participant mentions a paper by Zeilinger that covers similar content to the original recommendation but is more accessible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of the papers mentioned but express differing opinions on accessibility and the quality of explanations provided in various papers. No consensus on a single best resource exists.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that access to certain papers may depend on university subscriptions, which could limit availability for others.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking to understand Bell's theorem and its implications through various scholarly papers.

Edgardo
Messages
707
Reaction score
17
Hello all,

When I read the original papers by EPR and Bell here
http://www.drchinese.com/David/EPR_Bell_Aspect.htm
I didn't understand them.

But I found a paper that explains Bell's theorem quite good:

Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony, Anton Zeilinger
"Bell's theorem without inequalities", American Journal of Physics Vol. 58 (12), December 1990.

So for all the ones who are interested in Bell's theorem, read the paper! :smile:
Especially the Appendix, where Bell's inquality is derived.

If you know of any other good papers on this topic, just post them here.


Cheers!

Edgardo


P.S. To find the paper, type in google American Journal of Physics and Browse "All Online Issues"
http://scitation.aip.org/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=AJPIAS
Go to Volume 58, to December and search for the title.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried it but they asked for a username and password, or I could buy it for $18.50. If it were $1.50 I probably would have gone for it ;-)
 
Some other good papers on Bell's theorem

Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories
Hardy L
PHYS REV LETT 68: (20) 2981-2984 MAY 18 1992

"The mystery of the quantum cakes," P.G. Kwiat and L. Hardy, Am. J. Phys. 68, 33 (2000).

"Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell", N. David Mermin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803–815 (1993)
 
I found further good papers:

"Ghost-like action-at-a-distance in quantum mechanics: an elementary introduction to the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen paradox", R D Mattuck 1982 Eur. J. Phys. 3 107-112
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0143-0807/3/2/010

"Bell's inequality and 'ghost-like action-at-a-distance' in quantum mechanics", R D Mattuck 1982 Eur. J. Phys. 3 113-118
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0143-0807/3/2/011

Note: Your will be able to download those papers from your university's computer, since
your university has probably a subscription to those journals.
 
Although this is not his original, this one by Zeilinger covers much of the same ground as the one cited by OP:

Multi-photon Entanglement

And it doesn't cost 18.50...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K