1 significant digit but the answer doesn't make sense

  • Thread starter Thread starter john merrick
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of significant digits in the context of frequency calculations, specifically addressing the value of 425.16Hz derived from an initial frequency of 400Hz. Participants argue that the answer should reflect one significant digit, resulting in 400Hz, but express confusion over the implications of significant figures when the initial value lacks explicit decimal notation. The consensus suggests that the question should have clarified the significant figures, potentially indicating that 400Hz should be interpreted as 400.0Hz to maintain accuracy in reporting significant digits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in scientific measurements
  • Basic knowledge of frequency and its calculations
  • Familiarity with error propagation techniques
  • Concept of measurement uncertainty
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the rules for determining significant figures in measurements
  • Learn about error propagation methods in physics
  • Explore the concept of measurement uncertainty and its implications
  • Study how to properly report scientific results with significant digits
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching measurement principles, and professionals involved in scientific data analysis who need to understand the importance of significant figures in reporting results.

john merrick
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A train on a straight track sounds a 400 Hz horn when passing a parked car on
the road. The train is moving at 20 m/s and the temperature is 10°C. Find the
apparent frequency of the horn for a person sitting inside the car when the train
is approaching and when the train is moving away
Relevant Equations
no equation
my problem is not how you get the answer... 425.16Hz for approaching. it has to be do the right amount of significant digits.

so it should be 1 significant digit which would mean 400hz. which would make no sense since i started with 400hz.

i'm assuming they should have written the question with a decimal after one of the numbers so you would be looking at 2 or 3 significant digits in your final answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just call it 425Hz, or if you really want 430Hz. I don't think anyone will really care too much about it!
 
i got no problem with that but they are marking on the correct significant digits. so you just can't but whatever you want.
 
john merrick said:
i got no problem with that but they are marking on the correct significant digits. so you just can't but whatever you want.
I think most likely you are supposed to start w/ the assumption that the 400 implies 400.0, but I could be wrong. If that's not the case, then all bets are off since you have no way of knowing whether either of the 0's in the 400 are significant or not.
 
I feel it's a bit harsh to deduct points for incorrect significant figures, considering they don't tell you anything about the uncertainties in those measurements.

If you take it at face value, then I guess you just have to assume that ##f_0 = (400 \pm 1) \text{Hz}## and ##v = (20 \pm 1) \mathrm{ms^{-1}}##. What was the error on the value you used for the speed of sound?

Propagate those through quickly, and check what the error on ##f## is, and print a suitable number of significant figures.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
572
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K