1 significant digit but the answer doesn't make sense

  • Thread starter Thread starter john merrick
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding significant digits in the context of a frequency measurement of 425.16 Hz, which is expected to be rounded to one significant digit. The argument suggests that the initial value of 400 Hz should be interpreted as 400.0 Hz to justify the rounding, but this leads to ambiguity regarding the significance of the zeros. Participants express frustration over the strict grading on significant figures without clear guidelines on measurement uncertainties. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in how significant figures are communicated in problems to avoid confusion. Ultimately, the issue highlights the challenges of accurately representing measurements and their precision in scientific contexts.
john merrick
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A train on a straight track sounds a 400 Hz horn when passing a parked car on
the road. The train is moving at 20 m/s and the temperature is 10°C. Find the
apparent frequency of the horn for a person sitting inside the car when the train
is approaching and when the train is moving away
Relevant Equations
no equation
my problem is not how you get the answer... 425.16Hz for approaching. it has to be do the right amount of significant digits.

so it should be 1 significant digit which would mean 400hz. which would make no sense since i started with 400hz.

i'm assuming they should have written the question with a decimal after one of the numbers so you would be looking at 2 or 3 significant digits in your final answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just call it 425Hz, or if you really want 430Hz. I don't think anyone will really care too much about it!
 
i got no problem with that but they are marking on the correct significant digits. so you just can't but whatever you want.
 
john merrick said:
i got no problem with that but they are marking on the correct significant digits. so you just can't but whatever you want.
I think most likely you are supposed to start w/ the assumption that the 400 implies 400.0, but I could be wrong. If that's not the case, then all bets are off since you have no way of knowing whether either of the 0's in the 400 are significant or not.
 
I feel it's a bit harsh to deduct points for incorrect significant figures, considering they don't tell you anything about the uncertainties in those measurements.

If you take it at face value, then I guess you just have to assume that ##f_0 = (400 \pm 1) \text{Hz}## and ##v = (20 \pm 1) \mathrm{ms^{-1}}##. What was the error on the value you used for the speed of sound?

Propagate those through quickly, and check what the error on ##f## is, and print a suitable number of significant figures.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
281
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
872
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top