2 dimensional chiral boson theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rbwang1225
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson Chiral Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the development of a 2-dimensional chiral boson theory, referencing the paper "Covariant Action for a D=11 Five-Brane with the Chiral Field." The user seeks guidance on formulating the action for a chiral field in two dimensions, noting that the dual field strength ##F_{mnl}## becomes zero, leading to a simplified action ##S=\int d^2x\sqrt{-g}##. Key references include the work by Floreanini and Jackiw, which presents the Lagrangian for the 2D chiral boson, and a relativistic version attributed to Siegel, which remains inaccessible due to a paywall. The discussion highlights the complexities of the chiral boson, including the need for constrained quantization and issues with gauge invariance and infrared divergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chiral boson theory
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of constrained quantization techniques
  • Basic concepts of gauge invariance in field theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lagrangian of the 2D chiral boson as presented by Floreanini and Jackiw
  • Research Siegel's relativistic formulation of chiral bosons
  • Examine methods for regularizing infrared divergences in quantum field theories
  • Explore the transition from 5-brane actions to string theory actions
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, string theory, and the study of chiral bosons. It is also relevant for researchers interested in constrained systems and gauge invariance issues.

rbwang1225
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
I am reading the paper "Covariant Action for a D=11 Five-Brane with the Chiral Field" and want to make an analog for the chiral field in 2 dimensions.
But I don't know at the starting point, for if I take the local coordinates of the worldvolume to be ##x^m (m=0,1)##, the dual field strength ##F_{mnl}## will be zero and the action ##S## becomes ##S=\int d^2x\sqrt{-g}##.
Could anyone give me some advices?

Best Regards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The chiral boson in 2D was introduced e.g. by Floreanini and Jackiw (see here: http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v59/i17/p1873_1 ). In particular eq. 20 is the Lagrangian of the 2D chiral boson.

There is also a relativistic version I believe (or, at least, a more covoriant notation), which is I believe due to Siegel. I'm not sure, but I think he treats it in this paper:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/055032138490453X

but I can't access it, because of the paywall...

Now, keep in mind that the chiral boson is plagued by a lot of subtleties. It's a constrained system, which requires constrained quantization to turn it into a quantum theory. The theory may or may not have gauge invariance, depending on the boundary conditions. Finally, the theory has an annoying infrared divergence, which needs to be regularized using either a finite system size or the introduction of a mass term.
 
Dear xepma:

Sorry for the late reply.
I just wander how the action in the paper changes when I go from a 5-brane to a string?
Could you give me some idea?Ren-Bo
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K