2 particles created around event horizon: out or inside?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical scenarios of particle creation near a black hole's event horizon. Participants explore whether entangled particles can form just outside, just inside, or on the event horizon itself, and the implications of each scenario regarding black hole growth or evaporation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that particles could be created just outside the event horizon, with one falling into the black hole and the other escaping.
  • Others suggest that particles might form just inside the event horizon, allowing one to tunnel out while the other remains trapped.
  • There is a viewpoint that particles could form on the event horizon itself, resulting in one particle appearing inside and the other outside.
  • Some participants question whether the concept of particles forming inside the event horizon is meaningful, suggesting it may only exist in a mathematical sense.
  • One participant notes that the event horizon is not sharp, implying that particles could form in a "fuzzy region" around it.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of these scenarios on black hole stability, growth, or evaporation, particularly regarding the energy dynamics of the particles involved.
  • There is uncertainty about whether the particles are entangled, with some participants asserting they are, while others express confusion about the implications of entanglement in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the scenarios presented, with multiple competing views remaining regarding the nature of particle creation near the event horizon and its implications.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the definitions of energy in the context of black holes, the nature of entanglement, and the mathematical versus physical interpretations of particles forming inside the event horizon.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
The question is simple, and I have checked the "similar discussions" and googled, but I still come out with various replies. I also know that experimental evidence that could back up the selected choice would be tricky, not to say impossible. But at least according to theory: the entangled particles that would be formed around the event horizon: would they be formed
[1] just outside the event horizon, and one particle falls into the black hole
[2] just inside the event horizon, and one particle tunnels out of the black hole, or
[3] on the event horizon, with one particle appearing inside and one appearing outside, or
[4] the question is meaningless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't recall the particles being described as entangled, but I have no idea if they would be or not.

To my lay understanding, uncertainty allows for either 1,2 or 3 to occur but if its 1 or 3, I don't think the net change of particles inside the event horizon is negative.
 
Hmmm. Is it really correct that case 1 can happen? If so, it seems to me that the black hole gains one particle. If that is so in case 1, is there theory to predict that case 2 happens more often than case 1 so that one would expect evaporation as opposed to stability or growth?

I am not sure if case 3 is different after the outcome than either case 1 or or case 2, I guess I mean case 3 might not really exist in anything but a mathematical sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
One description I have seen is that the event horizon is not sharp. The two particles form in the fuzzy region with one going in and the other going out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
Grinkle said:
I don't recall the particles being described as entangled, but I have no idea if they would be or not.
Yes, they are definitely entangled. This is what gave rise to this whole flurry around the firewall paradox. (Although I don't completely understand this. I haven't figured out why, without the firewall, the particle inside would necessarily be entangled not only with the outgoing particle but also all the particles which had been "emitted" from the black hole earlier (which then leads to a contradiction). If anyone can explain that point to me, I would be grateful.
Grinkle said:
Hmmm. Is it really correct that case 1 can happen? If so, it seems to me that the black hole gains one particle. If that is so in case 1, is there theory to predict that case 2 happens more often than case 1 so that one would expect evaporation as opposed to stability or growth?
The explanation given by those favoring [1] is connected with the energy of the infalling particle: that with respect to an outside observer, the outgoing particle would have positive energy, so that the infalling particle would necessarily have negative energy (or, if you object to the phrase "negative energy" here, say that if the outgoing particle adds energy to the equation situation, the infalling one must subtract it), and it is this subtraction of energy that would be greater than the energy added to the black hole by the infalling (anti)particle. Thus, a sum evaporation.
 
mathman said:
One description I have seen is that the event horizon is not sharp. The two particles form in the fuzzy region with one going in and the other going out.
In other words, [4].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K