2 particles created around event horizon: out or inside?

  • #1
nomadreid
Gold Member
1,406
134

Main Question or Discussion Point

The question is simple, and I have checked the "similar discussions" and googled, but I still come out with various replies. I also know that experimental evidence that could back up the selected choice would be tricky, not to say impossible. But at least according to theory: the entangled particles that would be formed around the event horizon: would they be formed
[1] just outside the event horizon, and one particle falls into the black hole
[2] just inside the event horizon, and one particle tunnels out of the black hole, or
[3] on the event horizon, with one particle appearing inside and one appearing outside, or
[4] the question is meaningless.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Grinkle
Gold Member
656
180
I don't recall the particles being described as entangled, but I have no idea if they would be or not.

To my lay understanding, uncertainty allows for either 1,2 or 3 to occur but if its 1 or 3, I don't think the net change of particles inside the event horizon is negative.
 
  • #3
Grinkle
Gold Member
656
180
Hmmm. Is it really correct that case 1 can happen? If so, it seems to me that the black hole gains one particle. If that is so in case 1, is there theory to predict that case 2 happens more often than case 1 so that one would expect evaporation as opposed to stability or growth?

I am not sure if case 3 is different after the outcome than either case 1 or or case 2, I guess I mean case 3 might not really exist in anything but a mathematical sense.
 
  • #4
mathman
Science Advisor
7,771
419
One description I have seen is that the event horizon is not sharp. The two particles form in the fuzzy region with one going in and the other going out.
 
  • #5
nomadreid
Gold Member
1,406
134
I don't recall the particles being described as entangled, but I have no idea if they would be or not.
Yes, they are definitely entangled. This is what gave rise to this whole flurry around the firewall paradox. (Although I don't completely understand this. I haven't figured out why, without the firewall, the particle inside would necessarily be entangled not only with the outgoing particle but also all the particles which had been "emitted" from the black hole earlier (which then leads to a contradiction). If anyone can explain that point to me, I would be grateful.


Hmmm. Is it really correct that case 1 can happen? If so, it seems to me that the black hole gains one particle. If that is so in case 1, is there theory to predict that case 2 happens more often than case 1 so that one would expect evaporation as opposed to stability or growth?
The explanation given by those favoring [1] is connected with the energy of the infalling particle: that with respect to an outside observer, the outgoing particle would have positive energy, so that the infalling particle would necessarily have negative energy (or, if you object to the phrase "negative energy" here, say that if the outgoing particle adds energy to the equation situation, the infalling one must subtract it), and it is this subtraction of energy that would be greater than the energy added to the black hole by the infalling (anti)particle. Thus, a sum evaporation.
 
  • #6
nomadreid
Gold Member
1,406
134
One description I have seen is that the event horizon is not sharp. The two particles form in the fuzzy region with one going in and the other going out.
In other words, [4].
 

Related Threads on 2 particles created around event horizon: out or inside?

Replies
2
Views
792
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
659
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
620
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top