2nd order DE w/ various solutions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding solutions to the second-order differential equation y′′ + t(y′)² = 0. Participants explore various solutions and the conditions under which they apply, including how to derive these solutions and the implications of different values for constants involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants present multiple solutions for the differential equation, depending on the value of c₁: y=(1/k)ln|(k−t)/(k+t)|+c₂ for c₁=k²>0, y=(2/k)arctan(t/k)+c₂ for c₁=−k²<0, y=−2t⁻¹+c₂ for c₁=0, and also y=c.
  • One participant questions the derivation of the first solution and the reasoning behind the restrictions on c₁.
  • Another participant suggests that the correct form for the solution when c₁=0 should be y=−2t⁻¹+c₂, correcting a previous post.
  • There is a discussion on rearranging the ODE to \frac{y''}{y'^2} = -t and integrating to find y', with participants exploring the implications of different values for c₁.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the integration process that leads to y' = \frac{2}{t² - c₁} and expresses confusion over the steps involved.
  • Another participant provides a detailed explanation of the integration process, introducing a substitution u=y' and clarifying the steps taken to arrive at the final form of the equation.
  • A participant points out a typo in the final equation presented in the integration explanation, prompting further clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct forms of the solutions and the integration steps, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations and approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of the conditions on c₁ and how they affect the solutions, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these conditions or the correctness of the various proposed solutions.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Hi,

I'm currently finding a solution (i.e. y) for y′′ +t(y′)2 = 0.

The answer is:

y=(1/k)ln|(k−t)/(k+t)|+c2 if c1 =k^2 >0; y=(2/k)arctan(t/k)+c2 if c1 =−k^2 <0; y=−2t−1 +c2 if c1 =0; also y=c

(NOTE: c1 or c2 is just c_1 or c_2)

I've gotten the solutions as y = 0 or y=(2/k)arctan(t/k)+c2, depending on the initial conditions, but don't seem to understand how the first solution (i.e. y=(1/k)ln|(k−t)/(k+t)|+c2) provided in the answer was derived. Also, I don't quite understand why the restrictions are being stated (i.e. if c1 > k^2). If anyone could please explain why there are multiple restrictions and different solutions for each, and also how the first solution was derived, that would be extremely helpful.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
Hi,

I'm currently finding a solution (i.e. y) for y′′ +t(y′)2 = 0.

The answer is:

y=(1/k)ln|(k−t)/(k+t)|+c2 if c1 =k^2 >0; y=(2/k)arctan(t/k)+c2 if c1 =−k^2 <0; y=−2t−1 +c2 if c1 =0; also y=c

I think you mean [itex]y = -2t^{-1} + c_2[/itex] in the case [itex]c_1 = 0[/itex]; [itex]-2t + C[/itex], which is what you have, is not actually a solution.

(NOTE: c1 or c2 is just c_1 or c_2)

I've gotten the solutions as y = 0 or y=(2/k)arctan(t/k)+c2, depending on the initial conditions, but don't seem to understand how the first solution (i.e. y=(1/k)ln|(k−t)/(k+t)|+c2) provided in the answer was derived. Also, I don't quite understand why the restrictions are being stated (i.e. if c1 > k^2). If anyone could please explain why there are multiple restrictions and different solutions for each, and also how the first solution was derived, that would be extremely helpful.

Thank you!

For non-constant solutions, the ODE may be rearranged as [tex]\frac{y''}{y'^2} = -t,[/tex] and integrating once with respect to [itex]t[/itex] will yield [tex] y' = \frac{2}{t^2 - c_1}.[/tex] How would you proceed from here? It depends on whether [itex]c_1[/itex] is strictly positive (in which case it may be convenient to set [itex]c_1 = k^2[/itex] for some [itex]k > 0[/itex]), strictly negative (in which case it may be convenient to set [itex]c_1 = -k^2[/itex] for some [itex]k > 0[/itex]), or zero.
 
pasmith said:
I think you mean [itex]y = -2t^{-1} + c_2[/itex] in the case [itex]c_1 = 0[/itex]; [itex]-2t + C[/itex], which is what you have, is not actually a solution.
For non-constant solutions, the ODE may be rearranged as [tex]\frac{y''}{y'^2} = -t,[/tex] and integrating once with respect to [itex]t[/itex] will yield [tex] y' = \frac{2}{t^2 - c_1}.[/tex] How would you proceed from here? It depends on whether [itex]c_1[/itex] is strictly positive (in which case it may be convenient to set [itex]c_1 = k^2[/itex] for some [itex]k > 0[/itex]), strictly negative (in which case it may be convenient to set [itex]c_1 = -k^2[/itex] for some [itex]k > 0[/itex]), or zero.

Hmmm...do you mind possibly explaining how you integrated and went from [tex]\frac{y''}{y'^2} = -2t,[/tex]to[tex]y' = \frac{2}{t^2 - c_1}[/tex]? I may just not be seeing something, but any help would be much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
MathewsMD said:
Hmmm...do you mind possibly explaining how you integrated and went from [tex]\frac{y''}{y'^2} = -2t,[/tex]to[tex]y' = \frac{2}{t^2 - c_1}[/tex]? I may just not be seeing something, but any help would be much appreciated!
Let u= y'. Then y''= u' so the differential equation becomes [tex]u^{-2}du/dt= -2t[/tex] so [tex]u^{-2}du= -2t dt[/tex]. Integrating both sides [tex]-u^{-1}= -t^2+ C[/tex] or [tex]u= dy/dt= 1/(t- C)[/tex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MathewsMD
HallsofIvy said:
Let u= y'. Then y''= u' so the differential equation becomes [tex]u^{-2}du/dt= -2t[/tex] so [tex]u^{-2}du= -2t dt[/tex]. Integrating both sides [tex]-u^{-1}= -t^2+ C[/tex] or [tex]u= dy/dt= 1/(t- C)[/tex].

Was the [tex]t^2[/tex] in the denominator [tex]t-C[/tex] in the final step intentionally left out for any particular reason? If not, thank you so much for your help!
 
That was a typo. The last equation should have been
[tex]u= \frac{dy}{dt}= \frac{1}{t^2- C}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
959
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K