3 Questions about Force Table - Need someone to check my answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aransaja
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Table
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of force tables, specifically addressing resultant forces, equilibrants, and weight calculations. The participant correctly identifies resultant force as the net effect of multiple forces, equilibrant as the force maintaining equilibrium, and weight as the product of mass and gravitational acceleration. The necessity of centering the ring at the post is emphasized to ensure accurate force direction, while the equilibrium of a system with varying weights is clarified, indicating that equal reductions in weight maintain equilibrium only under specific conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resultant forces and equilibrants in physics.
  • Knowledge of gravitational force calculations (Weight = mg).
  • Familiarity with the mechanics of force tables and equilibrium.
  • Basic principles of friction and pulley systems in physics experiments.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of static equilibrium in physics experiments.
  • Learn about the mechanics of force tables and their applications in experiments.
  • Study the effects of friction in pulley systems and how it impacts force measurements.
  • Explore advanced concepts in vector addition of forces and their graphical representations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in experimental design using force tables.

Aransaja
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have an assignment to do about the force table.
I'm not sure about my answers, hope someone could check it for me if I answered correctly.

1.What kind of forces do you use on the force table? Explain about the used forces.

Resultant force, Equilibrant and Weight.
-Resultant force is a single force which has the same effect on an object as two or more forces are acting on that object.
-Equilibrant is a single force, which holds a whole system of concurrent forces in equilibrium.
-Weight = mg (where m=mass of an object and g = gravitational acceleration)


2.Why does the ring need to be centered at the post on the force table in finding the equilibrant?

Because if it's not centered the direction of force on the force table will be incorrect.

3.In a certain experiment using a force table, the system is in equilibrium at the center post with four forces are acting on the center ring and all forces are not in straight-line positions. If equal weights are taken away from each hanger, should the system be still in equilibrium at the same position? Explain.

Yes, the system would still be in equilibrium because there is still the same amount of forces acting on each string.


Yep, these are my answers. They look soo short to me. That's why it makes me feel so unsure with my answers. Is there something I forgot and didn't mentioned?
And most important are my answers right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Aransaja!
I think you have #1 well in hand. I would have said "gravitational forces" so you are way ahead of me.
I don't understand #2 at all. When my students did this experiment, they never had a post for the ring. The key to the whole thing is that the ring does not move, so according to F=ma, the total force (your equilibrant) is zero. We used spring scales instead of weights. I don't know the details of your apparatus, but if you are using hanging weights you must have pulleys to reduce friction at the bend in the strings. Could it be that all the pulleys are "aimed" at the post and therefore the ring must be at the post to prevent horizontal bending of the strings at the pulleys, resulting in friction?
For #3, if you reduced each weight by half, it would stay in equilibrium. But if you reduce each by 1 kg, it will be thrown out of balance. Say you have masses of 2 kg, 3 kg, and 4 kg and reduce each by 1. These are 50%, 33% and 25% reductions so the forces will no longer add up to zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K