37 Genes Related to Synesthesia Identified

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the identification of 37 genes associated with synesthesia, as detailed in the study by Tilot et al. (2018). This research utilized whole-exome sequencing to compare protein-coding genes in synesthetes and non-synesthetes, revealing significant genetic variants linked to neuronal development. Neuroscientist Simon Fisher led the study at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, highlighting the limitations of focusing solely on protein-coding DNA. The conversation critiques the narrow scope of exome sequencing, suggesting that non-coding DNA may also significantly influence synesthetic experiences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of synesthesia and its neurological basis
  • Familiarity with whole-exome sequencing techniques
  • Knowledge of protein-coding versus non-coding DNA
  • Basic concepts of genetic variation and its implications in neuroscience
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of non-coding DNA in genetic studies
  • Explore advancements in whole-exome sequencing technologies
  • Investigate the role of neuronal development genes in sensory processing
  • Study the broader impacts of synesthesia on cognitive functions
USEFUL FOR

Neuroscientists, genetic researchers, and anyone interested in the genetic underpinnings of sensory perception and synesthesia.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,768
Reaction score
12,178
Synesthesia is when a normal sensory input elicits sensation normally associated with a different sensory modality, for example seeing certain colors when hearing certain sounds.
I became interested in this years ago when I read "The mind of a mnemonist" by AR Luria, which described a synesthete with a photographic memory..
Unusual neuronal connections are usually thought to underlie this.
Here is a Science mag news story about a study comparing protein coding genes in synesthetes vs. non-synesthetes as lead to identifying 37 genes associated with synesthesia. Several of these genes are accosiated with neuronal development.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Here's a link to the scientific publication:
Tilot et al. (2018) Rare variants in axonogenesis genes connect three families with sound–color synesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA Published online ahead of print, March 5, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715492115

From the Science magazine news story:
In the new work, a team led by neuroscientist Simon Fisher at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, decided to take a slightly different tack. Using a gene-sequencing technique known as whole-exome sequencing that targets only the DNA that encodes proteins, the researchers cataloged virtually every significant DNA variant in three families in which the condition is common.

I take issue with the author of the Science magazine piece saying that cataloging all protein-coding variants captures all significant DNA variant. There is much more functional non-coding DNA than protein coding DNA in the human genome. Researchers focus on the exome because it's cheaper to sequence the only the 1% of the human genome that codes for protein and because we understand better how mutations in protein coding sequences will affect their function. However, I'd be willing to bet that changes in non-coding DNA sequences also play a role. Exome sequencing strikes me as the drunkard looking for his car keys only under the lamp post (i.e. the streetlight effect).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
15K