MHB 6.2.8 {{k,4},{3,k}}=k what is k

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
What positive real value of \textbf{k}, is the determinant of the Matrix
$\begin{bmatrix}
k & 4\\3 & k
\end{bmatrix}$
equal to $k$?
a.3 b.4 c.12 d. $\sqrt{12}$ e. none $k^2-12=k\implies k^2-k-12=0\implies k^2-k-12=0\implies (k+3)(k-4)=0$
$k=\boxed{4}$

ok basically I think most could just eyeball this and get it
but when I tried to ck it in W|A it froze,,,

W|A
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
got it :unsure:
 
Yes, what you have done is exactly correct!
$$\left|\begin{array}{cc} k & 4\\ 3 & k\end{array}\right|= k^2- 12= k$$.
[math]k^2- k- 12= (k- 4)(k+ 3)= 0[/math].

k= -3 and k= 4. Since the question asks for the "positive" solution, the answer is "4". Well done!

I would not use Wolfram alpha or any tool to check- just put k= 4 back in the original equation:
$$\left|\begin{array}{cc} k & 4\\ 3 & k\end{array}\right|= \left|\begin{array}{cc} 4 & 4\\ 3 & 4\end{array}\right|= 4^2- 12= 16- 12= 4= k$$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top