A ball being hit, find the energies and maximum height

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the energy calculations of a baseball hit by a player, focusing on its kinetic and gravitational potential energy, as well as determining the maximum height reached by the ball. The problem involves components of velocity, energy conservation, and the effects of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express unknowns symbolically rather than numerically, questioning the mass of the ball and its role in energy calculations.
  • Some participants explore the implications of the ball's horizontal and vertical velocities at maximum height, debating whether kinetic energy can be zero at that point.
  • There are inquiries about the relationships between gravitational potential energy and maximum height, as well as the correct application of energy conservation principles.
  • Questions arise regarding the dimensional consistency of the equations used and the definitions of variables in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on using symbols for unknowns and clarifying concepts related to energy conservation. There is a recognition of the need to establish a clear understanding of the relationships between kinetic and potential energy, as well as the maximum height calculation. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific values, such as the mass of the ball, which complicates the calculations. The problem also requires careful consideration of the initial height from which the ball is hit and the effects of gravity on its motion.

Charlene
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The longest homerun hit by Miguel Cabrera in the 2012 season occurred at Comerica Park and had an initial y-component of velocity of 19.8 m/s and an initial x-component of velocity given as m/s, where is some value left undetermined.
Assume the ball left the bat 1.22 m off of the ground. (Ignore the effects of air resistance.) Give the following:
a) the initial kinetic energy
b) the initial gravitational potential energy
c) the kinetic energy at the maximum height
d) the gravitational potential energy at the maximum height
e) the maximum height above the ground (you must find this using energy calculations)

Homework Equations


a) KI= 1/2 m1v1^2+ 1/2 m2v2^2
b) GPE= mgh
c)When the ball is at maximum height the velocity is 0 therefore i think the kinetic energy is also 0?
d) When the ball is at maximum height the velocity is 0 therefore i think the gravitational potential energy is 0..?
e)hmax=v^2(sin^2(θ))/2g

The Attempt at a Solution


a)KI=(1/2 m1(19.8m/s)^2) + (1/2 m2 (v m/s)^2)
=9.9m^2/s^2 (m1) +(m2 v m^2/s^2)/2
I feel like I am just missing a lot of information and don't understand how to find the mass of the ball..
b)GPE initial= mgh
(m)(9.8 m/s^2)(1.22m)
Once again i don't have mass so I'm confused where to go from here
c) 0
d) 0
e) i don't know if the formula I've shown is using energy calculations or not, and if it is i don't understand how to find θ and what velocity to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Charlene, :welcome:

I think you are supposed to use symbols for the unknowns. So the answers are experssions instead of numbers (with dimensions)

a) there is only one ball, so only one ##m##
c) is it really hanging still at that point ?
d) conflicts with the expression in b) (unless highest point is 0 m high ?)
e) re-do after the others are fixed.
 
BvU said:
Hi Charlene, :welcome:

I think you are supposed to use symbols for the unknowns. So the answers are experssions instead of numbers (with dimensions)

a) there is only one ball, so only one ##m##
c) is it really hanging still at that point ?
d) conflicts with the expression in b) (unless highest point is 0 m high ?)
e) re-do after the others are fixed.

So for part a) would it make sense for my answer to be 1/2m(392.04 m^2/s^2 +v^2 m^2/s^2)?

and for c) i do feel like the ball is sitting still at the maximum height because the ball slows down to a stop before falling back toward the ground.

d) so i need to find maximum height BEFORE i can actually solve for d?

e) h=V(vert)^2 sin(θ)/2g
h=392.04 m^2/s^2 sin(θ) / 2(9.8 m/s^2)
 
Last edited:
c) What makes it stop having a horizontal speed v ?
d) no. Think symbols. What is conserved ?
 
BvU said:
c) What makes it stop having a horizontal speed v ?
d) no. Think symbols. What is conserved ?

yes your correct, it doesn't stop having a horizontal speed i agree. but i thought at the maximum height i'd be looking at the vertical speed?

as for d) my initial guess would be to find a max height to plug into the equation for h, but since I'm not supposed to do that, I would think that maximum gravitational height would be equal to the maximum height because mg can be constants and would cancel out?
 
The exercise asks for
Charlene said:
the kinetic energy at the maximum height
 
BvU said:
The exercise asks for
so the kinetic energy at maximum height is
KE=mv^2
because I'm unaware of the mass and I am given v as my velocity for the horizontal

i now see why its not 0, it would only be 0 if it was thrown straight in the air, correct?

as for the gravitational potential energy,

GPE=mgh
=m(9.8m/s^2)h

h= Vf^2=Vi^2+2ad
(19.8 m/s)^2=0 + 2 (9.8 m/s^2)d
d=20 m

therefore GPE= m(9.8)(20)
=m(196 m^2/s^2)
is this now the correct approach
 
Last edited:
Charlene said:
so the kinetic energy at maximum height is
KE=mv^2
Actually it is ##\ {1\over 2}mv^2 \ \ ## with ##v\ ## the initial horizontal speed.
Charlene said:
it would only be 0 if it was thrown straight in the air, correct
Correct, then the horizontal speed is 0.

d)
GPE = mgh = m(9.8m/s^2)h ##\qquad## yes. But there is more to do here.
Charlene said:
h= Vf^2=Vi^2+2ad
h was a length, so this doesn't match dimensionally. (what is h anyway ?). Also you don't say what ad is (but I can guess :wink: -- looks like one of the kinetic equations.). Why introduce different names for these variables ?

Charlene said:
[edited] ##\Delta## h from Vf2=Vi2 +2g##\Delta## h
(19.8 m/s)^2=0 + 2 (9.8 m/s^2) ##\Delta## h
##\Delta## h=20 m
So it looks as if Vf is the initial vertical speed, and Vi is the vertical speed at the highest point. Then ad is actually ##g\Delta h##, the gravitational acceleration times the maximum vertical travel. I don't see the given 1.22 m at the start ?

A decent way to make this recognizable is to write this as an energy balance:$$ mgh_0 + {1\over 2}mv_{\rm 0,\, y}^2 = mg h_{\rm max} + {1\over 2}mv_{\rm f,\, y}^2 \Rightarrow mgh_{\rm max} = mgh_0 + {1\over 2} mv_{\rm 0,\, y}^2$$ (after all d asks for the gpe).

e)
Charlene said:
you must find this using energy calculations
Well, you have the gpe from d), so divide by gh to not get the 20 m you already found, but ...
 
BvU said:
Actually it is ##\ {1\over 2}mv^2 \ \ ## with ##v\ ## the initial horizontal speed.
Correct, then the horizontal speed is 0.

d)
GPE = mgh = m(9.8m/s^2)h ##\qquad## yes. But there is more to do here.
h was a length, so this doesn't match dimensionally. (what is h anyway ?). Also you don't say what ad is (but I can guess :wink: -- looks like one of the kinetic equations.). Why introduce different names for these variables ?

So it looks as if Vf is the initial vertical speed, and Vi is the vertical speed at the highest point. Then ad is actually ##g\Delta h##, the gravitational acceleration times the maximum vertical travel. I don't see the given 1.22 m at the start ?

A decent way to make this recognizable is to write this as an energy balance:$$ mgh_0 + {1\over 2}mv_{\rm 0,\, y}^2 = mg h_{\rm max} + {1\over 2}mv_{\rm f,\, y}^2 \Rightarrow mgh_{\rm max} = mgh_0 + {1\over 2} mv_{\rm 0,\, y}^2$$ (after all d asks for the gpe).

e)

Well, you have the gpe from d), so divide by gh to not get the 20 m you already found, but ...

Thank you so much, i understand it now! So using the formula you provided

hmax=ho+(mv^2)/2mg
=1.22 m + (19.8 m/s)^2/(2(9.8m/s^2))
Max height =21.2 m

And then plugging this into the GPE at max height would be
m(9.8m/s^2)(21.2m)
=(208. m^2/s^2) m
 
  • #10
Charlene said:
i understand it now
Good! makes my day :smile:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
55
Views
6K