- #1

- 679

- 2

On page 59, in deriving 3.48, from the first step to the second step, why can we just insert |0><0| like that?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter kof9595995
- Start date

- #1

- 679

- 2

On page 59, in deriving 3.48, from the first step to the second step, why can we just insert |0><0| like that?

- #2

- 194

- 0

- #3

- 679

- 2

- #4

- 649

- 2

The expression [tex] : \psi_1^\dagger \psi_1 \psi_2^\dagger \psi_2 : [/tex] is normal ordered. So in any terms in the creation/annihilation-operator expansion of this, all annihilation operators act on the state to the right before any creation operators do.

Since the incoming state on the right contains two particles and no anti-particles, the only contribution from this comes from terms where there are two particle annihilation operators (no anti-particle annihilation operators). This comes only from the [tex] \psi [/tex], not the [tex] \psi^\dagger[/tex].

The only possible result from the particle annihilation operators acting on the right is the vacuum state. Therefore he can factorize as he does, and put in |0><0| in the middle.

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 424