Recovering QM from QFT: David Tong Notes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

David Tong's lecture notes on Quantum Field Theory (QFT) detail the recovery of Quantum Mechanics (QM) from QFT, specifically on pages 43-44. The discussion highlights the definition of momentum and position operators through integrals, establishing that ket states are eigenstates with corresponding eigenvalues as position and momentum 3-vectors. The complexity of the intermediate calculations, particularly those involving integrals of operators, raises questions about the feasibility of deriving results rigorously. The conversation also touches on the emergent nature of Galilean symmetry at low energies, suggesting a blend of theoretical and experimental approaches in non-relativistic physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with Quantum Mechanics (QM) concepts
  • Knowledge of Feynman path integrals
  • Basic principles of Galilean symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Feynman path integral approach in detail
  • Explore the derivation of the chiral perturbation theory Lagrangian
  • Read Weinberg's volumes on QFT, focusing on bound states in external fields
  • Investigate the relationship between non-relativistic QM and relativistic QM
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory.

victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
Reading through David Tong lecture notes on QFT.On pages 43-44, he recovers QM from QFT. See below link:

[QFT notes by Tong][1] [1]: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft/qft.pdfFirst the momentum and position operators are defined in terms of "integrals" and after considering states that are again defined in terms of integrals we see that the ket states are indeed eigen states and the eigen values are therefore position and momentum 3-vectors.

What is not clear to me is the intermediate steps of calculations not shown in the lecture notes, in particular, the computation of integrals involving operators as their integrand, to obtain the desired results.
 
The full way is very hard, and maybe may not exist.

In the Wilsonian spirit, one would use the Feynman path integral to argue that Galilean symmetry is emergent at low energies and low speeds. Then one would write down all terms consistent with Galilean symmetry. If one could really do the maths, one would be able to determine which of those terms are important and which are not. I don't know if one can do the maths, or even if one can, whether anyone has done it. So the present use of non-relativistic physics must be treated as a mix of theory (Galilean symmetry emergent at low energies) and guesswork confirmed by experiment (determination of which terms are important).

An analogous case is the derivation of the chiral perturbation theory lagrangian. There are very interesting comments, including the non-relativistic case, in "Foundations of Chiral Perturbation Theory" in http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Chiral_perturbation_theory.

Another interesting place to look is the chapter on bound states in external fields in the first of Weinbger's 3 volumes on QFT. Then one has to also know the relationship between non-relativistic QM which can be derived from relativistic QM which can be derived from relativistic QFT. Relativistic QM, the intermediate theory, is not a coherent theory, but for some strange reason, non-relativistic QM is a coherent theory.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K