A- Grades and Their Impact on Graduate School Admissions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahsanxr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of receiving A- grades instead of solid A's on graduate school admissions, particularly for students in physics and mathematics. Participants explore concerns about academic performance, the significance of grade differences, and the broader context of graduate school applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the implications of receiving A- grades instead of A's for graduate school applications, specifically at top institutions like MIT and Harvard.
  • Another participant suggests that maintaining a 4.0 GPA in undergraduate studies is less significant than in high school, indicating that small grade differences may not heavily impact graduate admissions.
  • Some participants argue that an A- is a minor issue and that students should focus on overall performance rather than specific grades.
  • A few participants share personal experiences of struggling with finals and suggest that patterns of performance should be analyzed to improve outcomes.
  • One participant mentions that grades can be inflated at certain institutions, which may affect how graduate programs perceive GPA.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for grade curving in classes, which could affect individual performance relative to peers.
  • Another participant emphasizes that grades are not the sole indicators of knowledge and that understanding material over time is valuable.
  • Some participants note that if a student is receiving A-'s, there is no immediate cause for concern unless grades drop significantly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that A- grades are not a significant issue for graduate school admissions, but there is disagreement on the importance of striving for higher grades and the implications of grade curving. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to managing academic performance and expectations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various grading policies and practices at different institutions, as well as personal experiences with academic challenges, which may influence their perspectives on the significance of grades.

ahsanxr
Messages
350
Reaction score
6
I'm a freshman, Physics and Math double major with a long term goal to enter a top notch graduate school in one of the fields. My question is should I be worried if I get a lot of A- grades instead of solid "A"s? I think that might be the case for me this semester. I probably got an A in Calc III but from what the present situation seems like I'll probably have "A-"s in Intro Physics II, Fundamentals of Computational Physics, Differential Equations and my English Writing class. Is this something which will significantly hinder my chances of getting into a top graduate school? Do schools care whether you have an A or an A-?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you might as well drop out of school all together.
 
Alright, I should have clarified. I'm not one of those people who freak out and say things like "my life is over" when they see one B+. I just want to know whether top schools like say MIT or Harvard would care about such a thing. Even though I could have gotten A's in all of these classes, I'm still rather content with A-'s too.
 
ahsanxr said:
Alright, I should have clarified. I'm not one of those people who freak out and say things like "my life is over" when they see one B+. I just want to know whether top schools like say MIT or Harvard would care about such a thing. Even though I could have gotten A's in all of these classes, I'm still rather content with A-'s too.

Keeping a 4.0 for your undergrad studies is not only hard, but worth much less than a 4.0 as a high schooler. There are so many other things that departments look like when you apply to their grad school that a small mistake here and there don't really mean much. An A- instead of an A definitely fits in the category of "small mistake", if you can even call it a mistake/issue.
 
Pengwuino said:
An A- instead of an A definitely fits in the category of "small mistake", if you can even call it a mistake/issue.

I see. So assuming I get A- in all my classes (which hopefully isn't true. I might get an A in Diff Eq if the final goes well or Physics depending on the grade scale the professor decides on) except for Calc, my GPA for this year would be about 3.84. I guess I shouldn't be worried.
 
If your school is anything like mine, an 'A-' is worth a 3.75. Then, assuming you get nothing but 'A-' for your entire college career, that will be your overall GPA. I think that even the top-tier grad programs will look pretty favorably upon that, especially if it's supplemented with research and whatnot. You'll likely be fine.
 
Its not a big deal but the difference between an A and an A- should be quite small. So if you've developed a pattern of earning A- then you should try and find out where that small mistake keeps happening.

For instance I usually start out very strong but screw up near the end (especially Finals, I have trouble studying for finals). So find out how to improve yourself based on past patterns.


I mean for a little bit more effort you could take that 3.75 GPA to a 4.0. That is if there is even a difference between the two grades.


Of course I agree with everyone here that its not at all a big deal and you should be proud that you're making A-s in all your classes.
 
MIT has a policy that if you fail a class in the first semester, the grade is not recorded. The reason for this is so that people "get used" to lower grades and don't freak out if they run into problems there. Also grades at MIT and Harvard tend to be "inflated" with respect to most large public universities.

If you were getting a C. I'd be worried. If you are getting A-'s, I'd have to say that you should get used to it since it's going to happen again.
 
I have three 89s this year...THREE BORDERLINE MARKS. You will be fine...
 
  • #10
Chunkysalsa said:
Its not a big deal but the difference between an A and an A- should be quite small. So if you've developed a pattern of earning A- then you should try and find out where that small mistake keeps happening.

For instance I usually start out very strong but screw up near the end (especially Finals, I have trouble studying for finals). So find out how to improve yourself based on past patterns.I mean for a little bit more effort you could take that 3.75 GPA to a 4.0. That is if there is even a difference between the two grades.Of course I agree with everyone here that its not at all a big deal and you should be proud that you're making A-s in all your classes.

Well this semester I didn't have a good start. I got a 59 on my first Physics midterm, a 50% on the first Programming homework and my initial homeworks in general weren't that good. A lot of the time computational/calculational errors and misreading problems were the reasons for this, which is extremely frustrating for me. Its mainly the only thing standing between me being the getting 100's on my tests. These kind of errors have always bought me down. In fact today I had my Physics final and I completely misinterpreted a really simple optics problem which is going to cause me at least 5 points on a 100 point exam.

twofish-quant said:
MIT has a policy that if you fail a class in the first semester, the grade is not recorded. The reason for this is so that people "get used" to lower grades and don't freak out if they run into problems there. Also grades at MIT and Harvard tend to be "inflated" with respect to most large public universities.

If you were getting a C. I'd be worried. If you are getting A-'s, I'd have to say that you should get used to it since it's going to happen again.

Considering the classes I'm taking next semester, I think you're right. Although I would still aim for an A's, since you know the shoot for the moon saying and what not.
 
  • #11
I got a B in Differential Equations due to the poor final. I probably should be worried now. :(
 
  • #12
I think of grades as indicators of ones knowledge at one particular time. You can easily learn where you went wrong in the exam/test/whatever, and know the material at a later date, which if you were to be tested could be an A+ grade.
 
  • #13
ahsanxr said:
Well this semester I didn't have a good start. I got a 59 on my first Physics midterm, a 50% on the first Programming homework and my initial homeworks in general weren't that good.

If you got an A- with a 59 midterm that means that you are fighting the curve, and it's likely that you are going to get A's and B's because more people are average.

Its mainly the only thing standing between me being the getting 100's on my tests.

It's probably not. If people start getting 100's on the tests, the teacher will cover more material and make the tests harder. Also, if you are in a class with a high curve, and you do something better but everyone else does it better, your grades will stay the same.

Also at some point you need to make a decision as to whether or not getting 100's and 4.0's is worth it. The more time you spend on that, the less time you have for other things.
 
  • #14
ahsanxr said:
I got a B in Differential Equations due to the poor final. I probably should be worried now. :(

No. No you really shouldn't. If you start getting C's, and if you want to go to grad school, then you start worrying.
 
  • #15
twofish-quant said:
If you got an A- with a 59 midterm that means that you are fighting the curve, and it's likely that you are going to get A's and B's because more people are average.
It's probably not. If people start getting 100's on the tests, the teacher will cover more material and make the tests harder. Also, if you are in a class with a high curve, and you do something better but everyone else does it better, your grades will stay the same.

Also at some point you need to make a decision as to whether or not getting 100's and 4.0's is worth it. The more time you spend on that, the less time you have for other things.

Well there always are a couple of people with 100's or at least high 90 scores. And like I said before, it's not a matter of effort for me. I usually know the material but I just don't do as well as I can on tests because of making careless mistakes/misreading problems, so I have to work on that rather than spending excessive amounts studying.

Angry Citizen said:
No. No you really shouldn't. If you start getting C's, and if you want to go to grad school, then you start worrying.

This was an extremely disappointing grade for me, because honestly, I didn't find anything hard in that class (other than maybe the amount of algebra involved in the method of undetermined coefficients for higher order equations). The problem this time was that I failed to recall how to solve a system of differential equations with complex eigenvalues. That was just one problem, but the professor being as awesome as he is, based the next one on the previous one too. So I probably lost a total of 10-15 points on a 100 point final because of that.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K