A layman a bit scared of the LHC (as always)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GeorgeVT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit Layman Lhc
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around concerns and fears related to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), particularly regarding the potential creation of strangelets and the safety of high-energy particle collisions. Participants explore the implications of cosmic ray collisions compared to those at the LHC and address the psychological aspects of fear surrounding scientific advancements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • George expresses fears about the LHC, particularly regarding the possibility of strangelets forming, despite reassurances from the LSAG that their formation is unlikely at higher energies.
  • Some participants, including a senior undergraduate, argue that cosmic rays, which have higher energies than those at the LHC, have been colliding with Earth for millions of years without catastrophic effects.
  • Bob S points out that cosmic rays create particles that move quickly through the Earth, which may differ from the conditions at the LHC where multiple collisions occur simultaneously.
  • Another participant notes that neutrinos interact very rarely, while cosmic rays do create significant interactions in the atmosphere, suggesting a difference in behavior between cosmic rays and LHC collisions.
  • A later reply critiques the nature of fear and scaremongering, suggesting that unfounded fears can proliferate faster than they can be addressed, and emphasizes the importance of understanding physics to mitigate such fears.
  • George acknowledges the role of curiosity in his fears and expresses a desire to trust the expertise of physicists involved in the LHC's safety assessments over unverified claims from online sources.
  • Bob S humorously mentions a recent incident involving the LHC being shut down due to a bird-related event, adding a light-hearted note to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of views, with some expressing confidence in the safety of the LHC based on cosmic ray comparisons, while others share concerns about specific claims regarding strangelets. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the validity of the fears raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of particle physics and the complexities involved in high-energy collisions, which may contribute to the ongoing fears and uncertainties expressed.

GeorgeVT
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello there, I've been here before to ask for help with my fears about the LHC a while ago. Suffice to say I eventually overcame them thanks to the help from some members of this forum and that of Michaelangelo Mangano of CERN. However recently I've decided to revisit the old LHC Defense forums which I used to frequent (along with the likes of the notorious Walter Wagner and JTankers), and I came across some information from some links that gave me a panic attack:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=85475&page=2
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=85475&page=3

Specifically what worries me is the mention by Eric2 that strangelets may show up desipte the LSAG saying that with increasing heat their formation is unlikely. So far nobody has rebuked this, and this is getting me a wee bit (unreasonably perhaps) uncomfortable. Can anyone disspell this please? It would make me feel better

George
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what a stranglet is and I am not a particle physicist, I am a senior undergraduate. I am quite comfortable with the LHC though. Cosmic rays with energy on the order of TeV are known to collide with the Earth's atmosphere on a regular basis, with no ill effects. The only difference is that in the LHC, the collision will occur inside the experimental apparatus so the properties of the collision can be observed.
 
Cosmic rays sometimes have energies exceeding the center-of-mass energies (14 TeV) expected in the LHC, and have been hitting the Earth for over a 1000 million years. So if nothing has happened already, it won't in LHC.
Bob S
 
That is quite true, and I have heard of this point countless times before, yet I also heard that particles created by cosmic rays tend to move extremely fast through the Earth before they can interact. Also wouldn't there be many such collisions with strange quarks in the same area at the same time at the LHC? Regardless I have a very narrow knowledge on physics so hopefully you can point out a few flaws in what I have said here. While I wouldve liked a direct answer to what I was initially concerned with, I really appreciate you guys for helping me out here.
 
Neutrinos will travel through the Earth will very little probabilties of interacting. Cosmic ray photons, electrons, positrons, protons, and anti-protons will interact and create large electromagnetic or hadronic (including mesons) showers in a few hundred meters of atmosphere. This has been going on for billions of years.
Bob S
 
Why do you have the desire to be scared? Are you also a hypochondriac?
 
George, nobody is going to be able to dispel your fears. Consider the following discussion.

"Someone told me that I have to be afraid of the the glorbing fribbatz!"
"That's nonsense."
"Thanks - I feel better. But I was just told that I have to be afraid of the shibbering niberzing!"
"That's nonsense too."
"Great! But I just heard about the jabibbering klibbersnitz!"

It will never end. The fact of the matter is that scaremongers and crackpots can generate nonsense far faster than it can be argued against - because these scaremongers and crackpots aren't constrained by actual facts.

You have only two choices I see:
1. You can learn enough physics to make up your own mind.
2. You can ask if the claim is reasonable - that something in excess of 8000 physicists are working hard to destroy the world, and none of them are willing to say "stop". Does this make sense to you?
 
nuby said:
Why do you have the desire to be scared? Are you also a hypochondriac?

Well it really isn't as simple like that, I just suffer the tendecy of getting extremely curious and I am unable to control my curiousity, and and whatever I get worked up about tends to stay in my imagination for a while. This usually only extends to things such as my cat being gone for more than a few days, but if I seriously want to stop worrying about what Eric2 said in the links I realize that I merely have to ignore it and accept that the physicists that worked on the LSAG and reviewed are way more likely to have the right answer than some stranger on the internet.

Also thanks to Vanadium for explaining how scaremongering works. Another way the "crack pots" work is by remaining anonymous and to show "facts", which in turn can make some unifnformed people like me quite uncomfortable as they have no way of confirming anything at all based on the limited information that they receive. Such is the case with Eric2 that made me worried, along with his final post where it remains unanswered as I had previously felt comfortable with LSAG's explanation that the chance of strangelet creation decreases with energy.