A problem about computability theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iamwanli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof regarding effectively inseparable sets A and B, where B is recursively enumerable (r.e.). It concludes that the assertion that the complement of A, denoted as \bar{A}, is productive is false. The reasoning provided indicates that if B is r.e. but not recursive, then the conditions for effective inseparability do not lead to a productive complement. Specifically, setting A as \bar{B} demonstrates the contradiction, affirming that \bar{A} cannot be productive if B remains r.e.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of effectively inseparable sets in computability theory
  • Knowledge of recursively enumerable (r.e.) and recursive sets
  • Familiarity with the concept of productive sets in computability
  • Basic proficiency in formal logic and mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of recursively enumerable sets and their implications
  • Learn about effective inseparability and its applications in computability theory
  • Explore the concept of productive sets and their role in computability
  • Review formal proofs in computability to strengthen understanding of logical reasoning
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical computer science, particularly those focused on computability theory and mathematical logic.

iamwanli
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Soppose that A,B are effectively inseparable,B is r.e,then how to prove that [tex]\bar{A}[/tex] is productive
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't the place for homework. Also, when posting homework-type questions, you should state your definitions and what you've tried so far, rather than hoping that people will just give you an answer. Proper spelling and grammar wouldn't hurt either.

Anyways, what you've been asked to prove is false. Suppose [itex]B[/itex] is r.e. but not recursive. If the above were true, then we could apply it taking [itex]A = \bar{B}[/itex]. Then [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]B[/itex] are effectively inseparable because [itex]B[/itex] is not recursive, so the hypotheses are satisfied. But the conclusion, that [itex]\bar{A} = B[/itex] is productive must be false, since [itex]B[/itex] is r.e.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K