A problem about the laws of conservation: Bullet colliding with a wood block

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation laws in a collision scenario, specifically a bullet colliding with a wooden block. Participants are exploring the implications of conservation of momentum and energy in a closed system, while also considering the nature of the collision and the subsequent motion of the block and bullet.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of momentum and energy, questioning the assumptions about mechanical energy conservation in the context of the collision. There is also exploration of the implications of the bullet either embedding in the block or passing through it, and how that affects the analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have offered clarifications on the nature of the collision and the assumptions that must be made, while others are still seeking to understand how to proceed with the problem based on the given conditions.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the exact nature of the bullet's interaction with the block, specifically whether it embeds or passes through, which affects the conservation laws applicable to the scenario. Participants note that the problem statement could have been clearer regarding these details.

Platon7
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A cannon is fired vertically into a wood block with a mass of 1.4 kg that is at rest directly above it. If the bullet has a mass of 21 g and a velocity of 210 m/s, how high will the block rise in the air after the bullet has penetrated it?
Relevant Equations
KE, PE
I have tried the following. Firstly, we can write the law of conservation of impulse
m1*v1 = m1*v'1 + m2*v'2, that is the first equation for the system. Then we can write the law of conservation of energy, like KE1 + KE2 = PE1 + KE'2, and then we can substitute formulas, but as far as I can see we will get 4 unknows, namely v'1, v'2, h and v''2 and that is the problem. I think about using some kinematics laws but don't know whether it's relevant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Why do you think mechanical energy is conserved in this case?
 
I don't know, the system seems to be closed
 
Platon7 said:
I don't know, the system seems to be closed
It is a closed system. But, that does not mean that mechnaical energy is conserved.

Consider two cars of equal mass and equal but opposite speed crashing into each other. The total momentum is zero before the collision (momentum being a vector) and zero afterwards. But, the total energy before the collision is not zero. Mechanical (kinetic) energy is lost in such a head-on collision.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
Is there any further description in the problem such as what exactly does it mean by penetration? Does the bullet stop imbedded in the block or go all the way through it according to the problem?
 
bob012345 said:
Is there any further description in the problem such as what exactly does it mean by penetration? Does the bullet stop imbedded in the block or go all the way through it according to the problem?
As far as I understood, goes through and continues moving.
 
PeroK said:
It is a closed system. But, that does not mean that mechnaical energy is conserved.

Consider two cars of equal mass and equal but opposite speed crashing into each other. The total momentum is zero before the collision (momentum being a vector) and zero afterwards. But, the total energy before the collision is not zero. Mechanical (kinetic) energy is lost in such a head-on collision.
Yeah, I didn't think about that and it makes sense, because while penetrating almost for sure some energy was spent on heating the block, but then how am I suppoused to move further with solution?
 
Platon7 said:
As far as I understood, goes through and continues moving.
Then could you put the whole problem statement here exactly as it was given to you. Leave out no details.
 
bob012345 said:
Then could you put the whole problem statement here exactly as it was given to you. Leave out no details.
it is a full statement as I have written
 
  • #10
Platon7 said:
Yeah, I didn't think about that and it makes sense, because while penetrating almost for sure some energy was spent on heating the block, but then how am I suppoused to move further with solution?
Consider the collision between the bullet and the block. If the bullet is embedded in the block (which is what you are supposed to assume), then what does conservation of momentum tell you?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345
  • #11
PeroK said:
Consider the collision between the bullet and the block. If the bullet is embedded in the block (which is what you are supposed to assume), then what does conservation of momentum tell you?
m1*v1 = m1*v'1 + m2*v'2, where m1 and m2 - are masses of bullet and block respectively, v1 - velocity of bullet before the collision, v'1 and v'2 - after
 
  • #12
Platon7 said:
m1*v1 = m1*v'1 + m2*v'2, where m1 and m2 - are masses of bullet and block respectively, v1 - velocity of bullet before the collision, v'1 and v'2 - after
It tells you more than that. Remember that ##m_1## is embedded in ##m_2##. What does that tell you about ##v'_1## and ##v'_2##?
 
  • #13
oh, yeah, v'1 = v'2 = u, then we can calculate u, but what's next step?
 
  • #14
Platon7 said:
oh, yeah, v'1 = v'2 = u, then we can calculate u, but what's next step?
Projectile motion?
 
  • #15
PeroK said:
Projectile motion?
decelerated by g
 
  • #16
Platon7 said:
decelerated by g
What else!
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
What else!
I don't know, rectilinear also, we know the velocity before penetrating
 
  • #18
Platon7 said:
I don't know, rectilinear also, we know the velocity before penetrating
There's only gravity acting on the block and bullet after the collision.
 
  • #19
oh, now I see, then we can find h using (v^2-v0^2)/(2*a), right?
 
  • #20
Platon7 said:
oh, now I see, then we can find h using (v^2-v0^2)/(2*a), right?
Yes, or your original idea to use conservation of energy for the projectile motion phase.
 
  • #21
I didn't really understand that, so you mean, m1*v1^2 = (m1+m2)*g*h. I'm not sure about the right part of equation
 
  • #22
Platon7 said:
I didn't really understand that, so you mean, m1*v1^2 = (m1+m2)*g*h. I'm not sure about the right part of equation
That equation ignores the collision. This problem has two parts:

a) a totally inelastic collision.

b) vertical projectile motion.

You have to tackle these two parts separately.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilparker62
  • #23
do you mean (m1+m2)*g*h = (m1+m2)*u^2/2?
 
  • #24
Platon7 said:
do you mean (m1+m2)*g*h = (m1+m2)*u^2/2?
That looks right.
 
  • #25
yeah, because after dividing both parts for (m1+m2) we will get sth, that I have already mentioned above
 
  • #26
but when we assume that the bullet has penetrated and left the block, can we solve the problem?
 
  • #27
Platon7 said:
but when we assume that the bullet has penetrated and left the block, can we solve the problem?
You have to assume that the bullet is embedded in the block. If it passes through, you don't know the speed of the block.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: neilparker62
  • #28
PeroK said:
You have to assume that the bullet is embedded in the block. If it passes through, you don't know the speed of the block.
Okey, that you for help:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345 and PeroK
  • #29
Platon7 said:
but when we assume that the bullet has penetrated and left the block, can we solve the problem?
That would be a different problem and more data would have been provided to solve it. I do think the problem statement by the author could have been clearer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Platon7

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
835
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K