I A question about a small step in the proof of RSA encryption

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Leo Liu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Encryption Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a specific step in the RSA encryption proof, particularly focusing on the implications of equation 5 from the referenced paper. It clarifies that the relationship \( ed \equiv 1 \mod \phi(n) \) leads to the conclusion that \( \phi(n) \) divides \( ed - 1 \). This division implies that there exists an integer \( k \) such that \( ed \) can be expressed as \( \phi(n) \cdot k + 1 \). Consequently, this formulation allows for the equivalence \( M^{\phi(n) \cdot k + 1} = M^{ed} \). Understanding this step is crucial for grasping the foundational principles of RSA encryption.
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
1638205070973.png

From the paper https://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/Rsapaper.pdf
Can someone explain the green highlight to me please? Sorry that I can't type much because this is the final week. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It should be evident from equation 5
 
From ##(5)## we have
\begin{align*}
ed\equiv 1 \mod \phi(n) &\Longleftrightarrow \phi(n)\,|\,(ed-1) \\
&\Longleftrightarrow \phi(n)\cdot k = ed-1 \text{ for some } k \in \mathbb{Z}\\
&\Longleftrightarrow \phi(n)\cdot k +1 = ed \text{ for some } k \in \mathbb{Z}\\
&\Longrightarrow M^{\phi(n)\cdot k +1} =M^{ed}
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top