A question about "# of members"

  • Thread starter Thread starter phinds
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
11 replies · 2K views
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
19,385
Reaction score
15,622
Although I haven't looked in years, I'm pretty sure there used to be somewhere that showed how many members the forum currently has. I can't find that anywhere now. Did it go away or am I just not finding it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phinds said:
Although I haven't looked in years, I'm pretty sure there used to be somewhere that showed how many members the forum currently has. I can't find that anywhere now. Did it go away or am I just not finding it?
Have you tried the search box here in PF?
 
phinds said:
Although I haven't looked in years, I'm pretty sure there used to be somewhere that showed how many members the forum currently has. I can't find that anywhere now. Did it go away or am I just not finding it?
That info isn't public at the moment, but total members is around 250k
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
WWGD said:
Wow, IIRC, that number was around 200k relatively recently. Seems like a healthy growth rate.
We average about 60 signups a day. What is important is total active users.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, symbolipoint and WWGD
Greg Bernhardt said:
We average about 60 signups a day. What is important is total active users.
Yeah, I'd like to see that statistic.

I seem to recall that a couple of PF iterations ago there were 250,000 members but a HUGE number of those were one-time posters who never came back.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and symbolipoint
phinds said:
I seem to recall that a couple of PF iterations ago there were 250,000 members but a HUGE number of those were one-time posters who never came back.
Active members will be several thousand. We're a big homework help stop so that will generate a lot of "one a done" members.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
phinds said:
Yeah, I'd like to see that statistic.

I seem to recall that a couple of PF iterations ago there were 250,000 members but a HUGE number of those were one-time posters who never came back.
I always wondered about those. Why bother signing to post just once, or even a few times?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
WWGD said:
I always wondered about those. Why bother signing to post just once, or even a few times?
As Greg said, we are a huge one-stop shop for students with a specific question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
WWGD said:
I always wondered about those. Why bother signing to post just once, or even a few times?
Well, if Greg could device something like "sign up and stay as a member for ##x## days" where ##x \in [30, \, \infty)##, some people would choose the lower boundary value rather than the upper.
 
Wrichik Basu said:
Well, if Greg could device something like "sign up and stay as a member for ##x## days" where ##x \in [30, \, \infty)##, some people would choose the lower boundary value rather than the upper.
Good idea but it may end up being burdensome IT-wise.