High School A question about the self consistency principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Travel
Click For Summary
Neil DeGrasse Tyson's assertion that one cannot travel back in time to meet oneself aligns with the self-consistency principle in time travel discussions. The principle suggests that time travel scenarios, like the billiard ball paradox, can yield self-consistent solutions without paradoxes, allowing for infinite outcomes. However, these theoretical solutions often require conditions, such as negative energy densities, that have not been observed in reality. Consequently, while mathematical models may permit time travel interactions, practical limitations suggest that such scenarios are unlikely to occur. Ultimately, the feasibility of meeting one's past self remains a complex topic influenced by theoretical physics and the nature of spacetime.
BadgerBadger92
Messages
168
Reaction score
89
TL;DR
Sorry if I posted this in the wrong section.

Can you meet yourself through time travel?
I was watching a video from Neil DeGrasse Tyson on time travel. He said you can’t travel back in time to meet yourself. Is this correct or am I misunderstanding this? Explanations would be greatly appreciated.

I know it’s only a hypothesis, but I was wondering about the answer in terms of the self consistency principle.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what Neil DeGrasse Tyson said, but as far as peer reviewed papers go, I'd recommend the "billard ball paper", "Billard balls in wormhole space-times with closed timelike curves", https://pages.uoregon.edu/imamura/FPS/images/PhysRevD.44.1077.pdf

The result is interesting - in the context of your question, there isn't any paradox in a classical billard ball going back in time and colliding with itself. Rather, it generates an infinte number of solutions where one might expect only one. This relates to what is called the "Cauchy" problem.
 
  • Like
Likes BadgerBadger92
To add a bit to my previous post to attempt to motivate reading the paper by demonstrating relevance, the wormhole time machine is set up in a way that attempts to mimick the grandfather paradox with billard balls. In the grandfather paradox, you go back in time and shoot your grandfather so you can't be born - in the billard ball revision, you set up a situation where the billard ball will travel back in time and collide with itself in such a way that it can't pass through the wormhole.

But it turns out there are solutions, rather similar to the usual time-travel stories, where the billard ball collides with itself with a glancing blow, enough to deflect it from it's path so that it does not stop itself from going through the wormhole, but rather hits itself with a glancing blow, a self-consistent solution. And, interestingly enough, the authors found an infinite number of such solutions, which says some things about the mathematics of initial value problems around time machines.
 
  • Like
Likes BadgerBadger92
I would say it depends very much on what limitations you're putting on yourself. You can write down solutions to Einstein's field equations that include closed timelike curves and paths "near" those curves allow you to meet your past self, as pervect has described in some detail.

However, such solutions tend to require negative energy densities in order to exist which we've never seen. We suspect they can't exist. So you probably can't have the kind of spacetime where the above is possible.

So you can get different answers on this one, depending on whether you think of the kind of thing pervect describes as realistic or not.
 
  • Like
Likes BadgerBadger92
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
10K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K