- 22,823
- 14,864
This is incorrect. It explains both if applied correctly.phinds said:The odometer analogy does NOT explain time dilation, it explains differential ageing.
The discussion revolves around the analogy of an odometer in relation to time dilation and the implications for two starships moving towards each other in space. Participants explore the concept of measuring time and distance through spacetime, the synchronization of clocks, and the potential to determine relative motion based on clock readings from probes launched from each starship.
Participants express differing views on the validity of the odometer analogy in explaining time dilation and the implications of symmetry in the paths of the probes. There is no consensus on the correctness of the initial claims, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of motion and time measurement.
Limitations include assumptions about the synchronization of clocks, the nature of motion through spacetime, and the interpretation of time delays in the context of relativity. The discussion also reflects varying understandings of the implications of the odometer analogy.
This is incorrect. It explains both if applied correctly.phinds said:The odometer analogy does NOT explain time dilation, it explains differential ageing.
But this is the point. There are several members here who are qualified to determine whether the video was wrong or if you misunderstood. Both happen frequently.FIL said:I don't think the video was wrong I probably just misunderstood it.
Later in the thread I amended the scenario so that the probe launches occur when the two ships measure an agreed upon distance between themselves after they pass.Mister T said:By symmetrical do you mean simultaneous? Recall that simultaneity is relative. Two events that are simultaneous in the rest frame of one of the ships will not be simultaneous in the rest frame of the other ship.
Edit: By this I mean that if the two launches are simultaneous in the rest frame of one of the ships, they will not be simultaneous in the rest frame of the other ship.
Why were these values chosen?Ibix said:both at 0.4c. Five minutes later they launch probes, represented by the thinner lines moving at 0.95c. They catch up with the opposite spaceship at 12.27 minutes after the first meeting.
0.6c and 0.8c made for a very long chase phase (5 mins to launch, then 30 mins to overtake) and I wanted the diagram to be reasonably wide and short so you can see the ticks clearly. 0.4 and 0.95 were pretty arbitrary, I admit.robphy said:Why were these values chosen?