A question based on Lawrence Krauss' explanation

  • Thread starter TRB8985
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Explanation
In summary, the conversation discusses Lawrence Krauss' talk about the possibility of a universe being created through quantum fluctuations. The question is raised about whether a black hole could also be considered a universe, but it is clarified that black holes are not considered to be universes. The conversation ends with the individual seeking clarification and thoughts from others on the topic.
  • #1
TRB8985
74
15
Good afternoon gentlemen/women,

I have a question regarding Lawrence Krauss' talk called "A Universe From Nothing" (Which can be found at ). In the talk, Krauss says that quantum fluctuations can produce a universe. He mentions that if we were to observe this happening, the universe from our perspective would get smaller and smaller and smaller, whereas from those inside the new universe would view it expanding exponentially.

Really an amazing thing to discover, coming from someone like myself who's just now going to college for physics. Unfortunately, however, my mind was racing on the subject and I lost some sleep last night over a question that's been going through my mind.

Is it possible that a black hole could indeed be one of these 'universes'? I know that singularities shrink to an infinitesimally small point; wouldn't that be a matching descriptor to what Krauss said? (Of course, I realize we would never be able to see it from the inside, which has my idea turned on his head, because in a way, it might seem like a logical fallacy.)


Are there any out there who can ease my mental torment? =P

Thank you, and all efforts are much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
The whole issue of "black hole === universe" has been brought up so often here that I think it would be fair to say that the topic has been bludgeoned to death.

No, black holes are not considered to be universes or to cause universes.

EDIT: by the way, welcome to the forum.

I remember watching that video some time back and being very puzzled by the statement that it would appear simultaneously to be expanding AND shrinking based on your frame of reference. I don't get it.
 
  • #3
Thank you!

I'm sorry to have brought the dead horse topic back to life. I just couldn't shake it out of my head; I needed the thoughts of others much more qualified than I to help make a rational judgement.
 
  • #4
The idea of black holes 'birthing' new universes has been around for years. I see problems - like what happens to 'baby' when 'mom' merges with another black hole, or merely evaporates via hawking radiation?
 
  • #5


As a fellow scientist, I can understand your curiosity and excitement about the concept of a universe emerging from quantum fluctuations. Lawrence Krauss' explanation is indeed fascinating and thought-provoking.

To address your question, it is important to understand that black holes are not considered universes in the traditional sense. Black holes are formed when a massive star collapses under its own gravity, creating a singularity at its center. This singularity is a point of infinite density and is surrounded by an event horizon, beyond which nothing can escape.

While it is true that the singularity of a black hole can be described as a point of infinite density, it is not the same as the quantum fluctuation that Krauss describes. The quantum fluctuation that leads to the creation of a universe is a random event that occurs in the vacuum of space, whereas a black hole is formed through the collapse of matter.

Furthermore, the expansion of a universe created by a quantum fluctuation is not the same as the shrinking of a black hole. The universe expands in all directions, while a black hole's event horizon only expands outward.

Overall, while there may be some similarities in terminology, black holes and universes formed from quantum fluctuations are distinct concepts in physics. I hope this helps to ease your mental torment and continue your exploration of the fascinating world of physics.
 

1. What is the explanation given by Lawrence Krauss?

Lawrence Krauss explains that the universe can come from nothing, meaning that it doesn't necessarily require a creator or cause.

2. How does Lawrence Krauss support this explanation?

Krauss uses evidence from quantum mechanics and cosmology to support his argument that the universe can arise spontaneously from nothing.

3. What is the significance of this explanation?

Krauss' explanation challenges traditional beliefs and offers a scientific perspective on the origins of the universe.

4. How does this explanation differ from religious beliefs about the origins of the universe?

This explanation is based on scientific evidence and does not involve the concept of a deity or higher power as the creator of the universe.

5. What are the potential implications of this explanation?

If Krauss' explanation is accepted, it could have a significant impact on our understanding of the universe and our place in it.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Back
Top