A question on Dimensional Analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of dimensional analysis, particularly in the context of deriving equations involving physical constants. Participants explore how to handle constants in equations, such as the gravitational constant G, and the implications of dimensional correctness versus physical correctness in equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that dimensional analysis is primarily used to verify derived equations, while others question how to treat constants within this framework.
  • There is a discussion on whether constants like G should be considered dimensionless initially and later assigned dimensions based on the context of the equation.
  • Some participants propose that dimensional analysis can be used both to verify the correctness of an equation and to determine the dimensions of unknown constants.
  • One participant emphasizes that if an equation is dimensionally incorrect, it must be wrong, but a dimensionally correct equation may still not be physically accurate.
  • Another participant suggests that the determination of whether a constant is dimensionless or not depends on how it was derived, with examples from Newtonian gravity illustrating the need for G to have specific dimensions to yield force units.
  • There is a mention of the role of numerical or geometric constants, such as 4 pi, which are dimensionless and arise from integration over geometric shapes.
  • One participant notes that while the magnitude of G is experimentally determined, its dimensions can be derived from the known dimensions of the quantities in the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to handle constants in dimensional analysis, with no consensus reached on whether constants should be treated as dimensionless initially or assigned dimensions based on the context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of dimensional correctness versus physical correctness.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the dimensions of all physical quantities involved in an equation, as well as the potential for constants to have either dimensionless or dimensionful characteristics depending on their derivation.

Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13
Dimensional Analysis is really simple and I have read that it is only used to verify the derived equations. But I don't understand how we work with constants in Dimensional Analysis. For example, if we are given KE depends on mass and velocity, we can easily derive KE = 1/2 mv2.

In the above case we assume the proportionality to be dimensionless but what do we do if we want to derive the Newtonian relation between gravity and mass/distance. Do we still assume the constant G to dimensionless and later give it dimensions to fit the other units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yashbhatt said:
For example, if we are given KE depends on mass and velocity, we can easily derive KE = 1/2 mv2.

From dimensional analysis you can derive that it depends on [mass][velocity]2, but the factor of \frac{1}{2} comes from the work-energy theorem:

<br /> W=\int_1^2 Fvdt = \int_1^2 \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{x} = \int_1^2\left(m\frac{dv}{dt}\right)vdt = \frac{1}{2}m(v_2^2-v_1^2)<br />

Yashbhatt said:
In the above case we assume the proportionality to be dimensionless but what do we do if we want to derive the Newtonian relation between gravity and mass/distance. Do we still assume the constant G to dimensionless and later give it dimensions to fit the other units?

The dimensions of [force]=[mass][distance]/[time]2 and the dimensions of [m1m2/r2]=[mass]2/[distance]2, so you know you need a dimensionful constant that compensates for the difference. The way this was studied originally was not in terms of a direct relation like this but rather in terms of proportionality. In other words, you first derive/measure that the force of gravity is proportional to the product of the masses and also to the inverse square of the distance, then you worry about measuring the proportionality constant.
 
We can use dimensional analysis in two ways:

1. To verify if an equation is incorrect:
Suppose you have an equation and you want to make sure it is dimensionally correct. For this, you must know the dimension of all physical quantities in the equation. Plus you should also know the dimension of any constant which is present in the equation. By the way, a constant can have no dimension or it might have dimension.

2. To find dimension of a constant or any physical quantity:
Suppose you know an equation is correct. Now you want to find dimension of a quantity or constant present in the equation. In this case you must know the dimensions of all other quantities expect the one you want to find the dimension of.

Example of 1:
Suppose you are given a equation F = GMm/r2 and you are not sure if this equation is dimensionally correct or not.
To check if this equation is dimensionally correct you must know the dimensions of all quantities. You must already know the dimension of the constant G too.

Example of 2:
Suppose you know F = GMm/r2 is dimensionally correct. You know dimensions of F, m (or M) and r. Then by using dimensional analysis you can find the dimension of G.

By the way, you certainly know, if a equation is dimensionally incorrect it must be an wrong equation; but if an equation is dimensionally correct, it still might not be a physically correct equation.
 
So, we decide experimentally if the constant is dimensionless or not?
 
Yashbhatt said:
So, we decide experimentally if the constant is dimensionless or not?

No, it depends upon how the constant was created.

In Newtonian gravity the force is proportional to M*m/r^2, which has units of [mass]^2 divided by [distance]^2. But we want units of force, so the constant G must have the correct units to yield a force, but must also have the correct magnitude to convert from the units that are being used for mass and distance; the standard units in SI will be kg and meters, and force is in Newtons, so G must have units equivalent to Newtons*[meters]^2/[kg]^2.

In other cases the constant appears for numerical/geometric reasons: 4 pi comes from an integration over the surface of a sphere. These are dimensionless.
 
But in this case Force was already a known quantity. So, we could adjust the dimensions of G but we couldn't have done so if it were a completely new quantity.
 
The magnitude of G is experimentally determined, nut the dimensions are not.

You can always determine the dimensions for a constant by writing the known dimensions for both sides, then cancel the common factors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K