A very simple U-sub is wrecking my brain

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinksys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
jinksys
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Integral Sqrt[16-x^2]*x dx from 0 to 2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First thing I do is a u-sub, so

u=16-x^2

du=-2xdx

I also my bounds change to upper=12 lower=16.

After I integrate and swap out my U, I get

-1/3*(16-x^2)^(3/2) from 16 to 12.

Am I using the wrong method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is probably a stupid question, but why did you change the limits of integration?
 
Umm, this is actually a trig-substitution problem (which I guess is a class of u-substitution).

Try thinking of it in those terms.
 
Have you thought of trying a trig substitution?
 
Nabeshin said:
Umm, this is actually a trig-substitution problem (which I guess is a class of u-substitution).

Try thinking of it in those terms.

You sure it's necessary? I get an answer that matches my calculator without incorporating any trig.

EDIT: Oh.
 
You could do the problem using a u substitution, it's just easier to use the trig substitution.
 
I actually missed the *x in the problem the first glance through, but I still would go with trig substitution. Necessary, maybe not.
 
Are my bounds incorrect? I thought you had to adjust your bounds when using a usub.
 
You adjust if you keep the equation in terms of u, but if you substitute back in for x after integration, you retain the original x boundaries. Seems you substituted back into x and changed the boundaries, which doesn't work.
 
Nabeshin said:
You adjust if you keep the equation in terms of u, but if you substitute back in for x after integration, you retain the original x boundaries. Seems you substituted back into x and changed the boundaries, which doesn't work.

This clears up a lot. Thanks. I got the correct answer now!
 
That is one reason why it is a good idea to write the variable in the limits of integration:
[tex]\int_{x= 0}^2 \sqrt{16- x^2} xdx[/tex]
after the substitution [itex]u= 16- x^2[/itex] becomes
[tex]-\frac{1}{2}\int_{u=16}^{12}u^{1/2}du[/tex]