About a spacecraft trip to the asteroids

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Emspak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroids Spacecraft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the planning of a spacecraft trip to the asteroid belt, focusing on trajectory options and energy efficiency for potential asteroid mining missions. Participants explore various orbital maneuvers and the implications of using different gravitational assists.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes increasing the spacecraft's orbital speed around Earth to escape velocity in a retrograde direction to utilize a slingshot effect around the Sun for a more efficient trajectory to the asteroids.
  • Another participant suggests a prograde approach, leveraging Earth's velocity to minimize delta-V for reaching the asteroid belt, arguing it may require less energy than the retrograde method.
  • A third participant mentions the potential use of a Hohmann orbit as a more reasonable trajectory for reaching the asteroid belt without gravitational slingshots.
  • Concerns are raised about the high delta-V required to utilize the Oberth effect near the Sun, suggesting it may not be practical for most missions.
  • One participant notes the necessity of making a burn to match the asteroid's orbit upon arrival, highlighting the energy costs associated with this maneuver.
  • There is a shared interest in setting up a Lagrangian for modeling the spacecraft's trajectory, with some participants expressing uncertainty about including thrust or planetary influences in the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best trajectory approach, with no consensus reached on the optimal method for the spacecraft trip to the asteroids. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most energy-efficient strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their proposed methods, particularly regarding the high energy costs associated with certain maneuvers and the complexities of modeling trajectories with thrust and gravitational influences.

Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
This was something I was kicking around and wanted some advice on.

Let's assume you had a big spaceship -- the kind you'd use t set off on a trip to the Asteroids, and were willing to take some time about it, on the order of a couple of years. Maybe you want to do asteroid mining or mine iceteroids for volatiles.

You're in Earth orbit, where the thing was built. You have a nice, big, NERVA type engine.

Which is the better plan, with the best combination of shorter travel time with energy efficiency:

-- Increase the ship's orbital speed around Earth -- let's say it starts in MEO - and get it to escape velocity in the direction retrograde to Earth's orbit. That will slow it down relative to the Sun, and the ship can fall in and slingshot around to the asteroids. When the ship is deep in the sun's gravity well you could even do a burn and boost its speed further, and get a nice long parabolic / extremely elliptical trajectory to the relevant spot.

-- Same thing, but going prograde, and using the free velocity you get from being around Earth and traveling with it to boost out to Mars and past it, since the delta-V would be (I think) less to get the same nice orbit out to between Mars and Jupiter, which is approximately where you want to be.

-- Some kind of VEGA trajectory.

I was also curious about how to set of a good langrangian for this. Was thinking of using the sun as my origin, but if anyone has a better idea please!

(And I was thinking of modeling this on Mathematica for giggles, but I don't know if it would work at all well as I am a beginner)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Getting close to the sun (to use the Oberth effect there) needs such a large delta_v that it is not reasonable for most solar system missions. To reach the asteroid belt (similar to Dawn), and without gravitational slingshots at planets, a Hohmann orbit is the best way.

I was also curious about how to set of a good langrangian for this.
The potential is known, the kinetic energy term is easy... setting up a Lagrangian is not the issue, finding solutions (if you include thrust or planets) is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
thanks -- this helps a lot...
 
If you first drop down deep in the sun's gravity well and set up an elliptical orbit that gets you to an asteroid, you still have to make a burn when you get to the asteroid to match its orbit (if you want to rendezvous). That means that you have to bring that part of the orbit deep in the sun's gravity well up to the asteroid, and that's going to be extremely costly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K