About null and timelike geodesics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronomer107
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesics
Click For Summary
Null geodesics are paths that light and massless particles follow, while timelike geodesics represent the paths that massive objects can take through spacetime. A geodesic is defined as a path of extremal length, not necessarily the shortest, between two points in a given space, which can vary based on the metric used. For example, multiple geodesics can exist between two points, such as a straight line and a helical path on a cylinder. The concept of geodesics is crucial in understanding the geometry of spacetime, especially in the context of general relativity. Understanding these distinctions is essential for grasping the principles discussed in works like Hawking and Penrose's "The Nature of Space and Time."
Astronomer107
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Can you explain a little more about null and timelike geodesics (I think that's how you spell it)? I was reading Hawking and Penrose's The Nature of Space and Time, but it got a little technical. I would really like to know more about these though... thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
To put it simply, a null geodesic is a path light can take, a timelike geodesic is a path everything else can take.
 
a geodesic is a the shortest path from point to point in a specific space, i.e. straight line on a piece of paper, a curve on a sphere
timelike means future pointing.
timelike geodeise is the shortest path an object can travel from event A to event B in spacetime.

hope this is right or i'll fail my exam in 2 weeks time...
 
  • Like
Likes Photonnnn
You're right, but don't forget Null Geodesics. These are the ones that only light (and massless particles) can follow. It was a null geodesic that the light followed in Eddington's 1919 observation of light shifting near the Sun. Also "shortest time" for a geodesic should be replaced with "stationary action" - but perhaps your course hasn't got to that yet.
 
Originally posted by thankqwerty
a geodesic is a the shortest path from point to point in a specific space, i.e. straight line on a piece of paper, a curve on a sphere

I wrote up a web page on this a while back. Its located here
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/ma/geodesic.htm

There are three basic ways to obtain the geodesic equation that I know of and so I posted those three derivations.

Please note that a geodesic is not defined as the shortest path from one point to another. It's a path of extremal length (where length has a meaning defined by the metric). There may be multiple paths between the same two points which are geodesics and each may have a different length.

Consider the cylinder r = R. Let the z-axis be the axis of the cylinder. consider the two points.

Point 1: r = R, theta = 0, z = 0
Point 2: r = R, theta = 0, z = b

The straight line from Point 1 to Point 2 is a geodesic. However the helix

x(t) = R cos(t) i + R sin(t) j + (b/2*pi)t k

is also a geodesic. See Figure 4 at
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/euclid_vs_flat.htm

Notice that there are an infinite number of geodesics between those two points. You can define a helix which has one end at Point 1 and hich coils around the cylinder N times before passing through Point 2 where N is an arbitrary integer. And of course there are two helices for each end which differ only in the direction that it winds.

If you were to draw each of these curves onto the clyinder and cut the cylinder along its length then lay it out flat then each curve would be a straight line.

Think of a geodesic as the straightest possible curve.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
821
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K