Abstract Math: Beyond Category Theory

Click For Summary
Category theory is recognized for its high level of abstraction, but other mathematical branches like sheaf theory, cohomology theories, algebraic geometry, and logic also exhibit significant abstraction. While these fields utilize category theory, their relative levels of abstraction are subjective and depend on individual perspectives. Logic, particularly model theory, is seen as equally abstract since it can analyze both set theory and category theory. The discussion highlights the challenge of defining "abstract" in a mathematical context, suggesting that category theory serves as a benchmark for comparison. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexity and interconnectedness of abstract mathematical concepts.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
Category theory is considered extremely abstract. What are some other branches of mathematics which are considered as abstract or even more abstract then category theory?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think I'm in a position to answer this fully. Things like sheaf theory, cohomology theories, algebraic geometry can be pretty abstract.. they use category theory to some extent, but I don't know if they're 'more abstract'. Logic seems to me to be on an equal footing with category theory in terms of how abstract it can get, but a logician might disagree. Universal algebra is another example, though I've never learned any.
 
I rather expect that, in order to determine which of "category theory", "set theory", "logic", or "universal algebra" are more or less abstract, you will need an abstract definition of "abstract"!
 
For ease of comparison, let's just have category theory as a standard for what is abstract.

How is logic up there with category theory?
 
If you take category theory as the standard then since nothing is more like category theory than category theory everything else falls a bit short. :smile:

I suppose I'd put logic up there because while you use e.g. set theory and category theory to study mathematical structures, logic can be used to study both of these theories (set theory is a branch of logic). Model theory is another branch which studies structures in a similar way to universal algebra. To me the study of different types of logic purely for their own sake is as abstruse as studying categories. Just my opinion though.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K