Acceleration of space shuttle at liftoff

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the acceleration experienced by the space shuttle during liftoff, particularly the ΔV/ΔT shortly after launch. Participants explore various aspects of rocket efficiency, thrust, and acceleration metrics in relation to the shuttle's performance in the initial moments of flight.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the specific acceleration values of the shuttle shortly after liftoff, noting that the shuttle is designed to reach about 3G's.
  • There is a request for detailed acceleration data in increments of 500 to 1000 ms during the first 15 to 30 seconds after launch.
  • Some participants mention that rocket efficiency is lower at lower speeds and increases as the shuttle approaches exhaust velocity, with maximum efficiency occurring when vehicle velocity equals exhaust velocity.
  • One participant notes that the maximum g-force occurs right at liftoff, suggesting that the shuttle experiences about 3 g's, but mentions that a graph indicates less than 1 g of acceleration for the first minute, possibly due to engine throttling.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the availability of acceleration data in milliseconds, citing the instability of readings due to vibrations during liftoff.
  • There are discussions about the relationship between thrust, ambient pressure, and propulsive efficiency, with some participants stating that maximum thrust occurs in a vacuum and that maximum acceleration happens shortly after reaching maximum dynamic pressure (Max Q).
  • One participant references a model of thrust and propulsive efficiency, emphasizing that maximum efficiency is achieved right before fuel depletion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the acceleration and efficiency of the shuttle, with no clear consensus on the specific values or the implications of the data discussed. Multiple competing views remain regarding the efficiency and performance metrics of the shuttle during liftoff.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the potential unavailability of detailed acceleration data due to ITAR restrictions and the dependence on specific definitions of efficiency and thrust. There are unresolved mathematical steps in the discussions about thrust models and propulsive efficiency.

FiggyOO
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Well, first off I finally got around to making an account here.
Enough with the introduction, let's get to business.

I have been trying to find to no avail the acceleration that the shuttle experiences. I know that the shuttle is designed to go up to about 3G's but what I am really looking for is the ΔV/ΔT around the area where V>=0 ( the time shortly after liftoff )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FiggyOO said:
Well, first off I finally got around to making an account here.
Enough with the introduction, let's get to business.

I have been trying to find to no avail the acceleration that the shuttle experiences. I know that the shuttle is designed to go up to about 3G's but what I am really looking for is the ΔV/ΔT around the area where V>=0 ( the time shortly after liftoff )


"At some point about one minute after launch and at an altitude of about 35,000 ft (10,675 m), conditions are such that the dynamic pressure has reached 'maximum q.'"
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/aerodynamics/q0025.shtml

Nice time/velocity graph there.

And a chart here:
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/ spacecraft /q0183.shtml
 
Last edited:
Would it be possible to get probably the first 15 or 30 seconds in increments from about 500 to 1000 ms?
 
FiggyOO said:
Would it be possible to get probably the first 15 or 30 seconds in increments from about 500 to 1000 ms?
All I did was google terms compiled from your original question.

Is that milliseconds? Yike.

Your best bet might be to email the right person at NASA, explain why you want those numbers and appeal to their good nature.

But why would you need real numbers instead of just some reasonably plausible numbers?
 
Last edited:
I had read somewhere, don't have where at the moment, that at lower speeds the efficiency of the rockets are much less efficient. But as the velocity of the craft approaches the exhaust velocity it become extremely efficient.
 
FiggyOO said:
I had read somewhere, don't have where at the moment, that at lower speeds the efficiency of the rockets are much less efficient. But as the velocity of the craft approaches the exhaust velocity it become extremely efficient.
The propulsive efficiency is maximum at the condition where the vehicle velocity is exactly equal to the exhaust velocity.
 
It is also more efficient in space...

I read somewhere once that the max g-force was right at liftoff and is 3 g's (which would be 2 g's of acceleration + gravity). The graph Dave found shows a little less than 1 g of acceleration for the first minute, though I guess that could be because the shuttle throttles back its engines soon after it clears the tower.

I seriously doubt NASA even records acceleration numbers in ms, as the shuttle experiences strong low frequency vibrations that would make acceleration readings over such a short time slice very unstable and largely useless.
 
On the same lines of space rockets, anyone know where I can get the volume of exhaust gases created by oh say the solid rocket motors, or the like?
 
Figgy, the detailed data you want is most likely unavailable to the public due to ITAR restrictions.

FredGarvin said:
The propulsive efficiency is maximum at the condition where the vehicle velocity is exactly equal to the exhaust velocity.

No. The rocket's acceleration is the same in all inertial reference frames. The propulsive efficiency (in terms of force) is maximum in vacuum. In terms of acceleration, the propulsive efficiency reaches maximum right before the vehicle runs out of fuel. A simple model of thrust from a rocket is (see http://exploration.grc.nasa.gov/education/rocket/thrsteq.html)

F = \dot m \, v_e + (p_e -p_0) A_e

russ_watters said:
It is also more efficient in space...

All other things being equal, the thrust (see above) will be at maximum when the ambient pressure (p_0) is zero.

I read somewhere once that the max g-force was right at liftoff and is 3 g's (which would be 2 g's of acceleration + gravity). The graph Dave found shows a little less than 1 g of acceleration for the first minute, though I guess that could be because the shuttle throttles back its engines soon after it clears the tower.
Maximum acceleration occurs shortly after Max Q. The increases thrust after Max Q. You can see this in the graph Dave found. During the first 60 seconds the Shuttle accelerates to 1400 ft/sec, and adds another 2600 ft/sec in the next 60 seconds. The Shuttle throttles up to 104% thrust just after Max Q. After this, Shuttle throttles down to keep acceleration at a constant. If it instead maintained a constant force, the acceleration would grow as the fuel becomes depleted.
 
  • #10
D H said:
No. The rocket's acceleration is the same in all inertial reference frames. The propulsive efficiency (in terms of force) is maximum in vacuum. In terms of acceleration, the propulsive efficiency reaches maximum right before the vehicle runs out of fuel. A simple model of thrust from a rocket is (see http://exploration.grc.nasa.gov/education/rocket/thrsteq.html)

F = \dot m \, v_e + (p_e -p_0) A_e



All other things being equal, the thrust (see above) will be at maximum when the ambient pressure (p_0) is zero.


Maximum acceleration occurs shortly after Max Q. The increases thrust after Max Q. You can see this in the graph Dave found. During the first 60 seconds the Shuttle accelerates to 1400 ft/sec, and adds another 2600 ft/sec in the next 60 seconds. The Shuttle throttles up to 104% thrust just after Max Q. After this, Shuttle throttles down to keep acceleration at a constant. If it instead maintained a constant force, the acceleration would grow as the fuel becomes depleted.
I didn't say anything about maximum thrust. I said that max propulsive efficiency is a maximum when the exhaust jet velocity is equal to the vehicle velocity. It's a basic definition.

\eta_p=\frac{Tu}{Tu+\frac{\overdot{w}}{2 g_o}(c-u)^2}

It has to be at that point because that means that all of the kinetic energy is used, i.e. there is no residual kinetic energy in the exhaust stream.

ref: Sutton, Rocket Propulsion Elements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PropulsiveEfficiency.GIF
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K