Active Denial Technology [Pain guns]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Technology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Active Denial Technology (ADT), specifically the Active Denial System (ADS), utilizes a 95GHz non-ionizing electromagnetic beam to induce intolerable pain by rapidly heating the upper layers of human skin without causing burns. This technology is designed for crowd control and has been deemed effective by the Department of Energy (DoE) for repelling individuals. However, concerns have been raised regarding its potential to induce shock and other unintended consequences, particularly in vulnerable populations. Testing indicates that most common materials are ineffective as countermeasures against the ADS, raising ethical questions about its deployment in law enforcement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation
  • Familiarity with crowd control technologies
  • Knowledge of the physiological effects of pain and shock
  • Awareness of ethical implications in law enforcement practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physiological effects of 95GHz electromagnetic radiation on human tissue
  • Explore the ethical considerations surrounding non-lethal weapons in law enforcement
  • Investigate existing countermeasures against Active Denial Technology
  • Learn about the design and functionality of the Active Denial System (ADS)
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for law enforcement professionals, military personnel, ethical policymakers, and researchers in non-lethal weapon technologies.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
2,658
...According to the DoE, the technology is capable of rapidly heating human skin to a pain level that has been demonstrated as "very effective at repelling people" without apparently burning the skin or causing other secondary effects.

ADT emits a 95GHz non-ionizing electromagnetic beam of energy that penetrates approximately 1/64 of an inch into human skin tissue, where nerve receptors are concentrated.

Within seconds, the beam will heat the exposed skin tissue to a level where intolerable pain is experienced and natural defense mechanisms take over. This intense heating sensation stops only if the individual moves out of the beam's path or the beam is turned of, vnu.com said [continued]
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/terrorwar-05zk.html
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It wouldn't work here in Oregon, or any place else that has a methamphetamine problem.
 
Last edited:
The weapon may be too dangerous to use, because the intolerable pain may cause the person to go into shock causing more damage than intended
 
KonradKorzenowski said:
The weapon may be too dangerous to use, because the intolerable pain may cause the person to go into shock causing more damage than intended

Thats a noodle scratcher :D. Does the body go into shock because of pain or because severe damage is being 'dealt' to your body? This weapon only "microwaves" the upper most layers of your skin so it doesn't seem like a whole lot of damage is realistically being done.
 
There is such a thing as phychologically induced shock, but only a
wussy coudn't take 95 GHz without dying.

I'm not sure if the eye wouldn't get cataracts even from a 1/64th
inch penetration of the cornea though.
 
So, I see a market for personal Faraday cages or shields. :biggrin:
 
Astronuc said:
So, I see a market for personal Faraday cages or shields. :biggrin:
I keep forgetting how old you are. You're the same guy who marketed lead petticoats when X-rays were discovered, aren't you? :-p

By the way, I seem to recall somebody somewhere offering Faraday cages, but I can't for the life of me remember where or why. Might have had something to do with the cell phone/brain cancer scare.
 
Pain Beam Not Easily Foiled

...Captain Jay Delarosa, spokesman for the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate told me:

"We have conducted extensive testing and have determined that most readily available materials are not effective as countermeasures against the ADS.“ [continued]
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003107.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
KonradKorzenowski said:
The weapon may be too dangerous to use, because the intolerable pain may cause the person to go into shock causing more damage than intended
It is all about rules of engagament. If it is used in a situation where a gun otherwise might have been used, it is clearly the safer alternative.
 
  • #10
KonradKorzenowski said:
The weapon may be too dangerous to use, because the intolerable pain may cause the person to go into shock causing more damage than intended
Any weapon has that capability.
 
  • #11
The US military revealed a heat-ray gun, the Active Denial System (ADS), to reporters this week.

The technology brings a new, more disorientating dimension to crowd control. [continued]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6300985.stm
 
  • #12
Sounds like the US police will soon have a new toy next to taser and pepper spray to torture people into cooperating. Don't let them tell you this will replace "lethal' weapons we all know this is bull!
 
  • #13
jaap de vries said:
Sounds like the US police will soon have a new toy next to taser and pepper spray to torture people into cooperating. Don't let them tell you this will replace "lethal' weapons we all know this is bull!

You obviously have no knowledge of how the US law enforcement works. Have you watched the entire video of that incident? After they told him to leave, he was in violation of the law. When the cops went to remove him from the building, he resisted. The cops were 100% correct in their actions.

But let's keep the thread on topic. you can PM me if you want to discuss this more.
 
  • #14
The main difference is that this is an area weapon - like tear gas ( or carpet bombing)
You can 'taser' an entire demonstration/march with this. In fact you could fit it to all CCTV cameras and be able to create an automatic demo-free zone.
 
  • #15
How large is this thing? And how large of a battery does this need? Doesn't seem like this would work at very long distances.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K