Adding increasing fractions without averaging numerators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the inequality stated in Theorem 1: \( \left( \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{a_i}{n} \right) \left( \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{b_i} \right) > \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{a_i}{b_i} \), where \( n \geq 2 \) and \( a_1 < a_2 < ... < a_n \) and \( b_1 < b_2 < ... < b_n \). The proof is initiated for the base case of \( n = 2 \) and is subsequently generalized using mathematical induction. The final conclusion confirms the validity of the inequality, establishing it as a formal proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical inequalities and proofs
  • Familiarity with the concept of mathematical induction
  • Knowledge of summation notation and manipulation
  • Basic algebraic skills for rearranging and expanding expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore common inequalities in mathematics, such as Cauchy-Schwarz and AM-GM inequalities
  • Investigate related problems, such as proving \( \frac{a}{b} + \frac{b}{c} + \frac{c}{a} \geq 3 \)
  • Review advanced topics in inequality theory, including the use of inverses in inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced algebra, and anyone interested in formal proofs of inequalities and mathematical reasoning.

Afterthought
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
I'm interested in the following inequality (which may or may not be true)

Theorem 1:
##( \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{a_i} {n}\ )( \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1} {b_i}\ ) > \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{a_i} {b_i}\ ##
Where ##n ≥ 2, a_1 < a_2 < ... < a_n## and ##b_1 < b_2 < ... < b_n##.

My attempt at a proof:

1) When n = 2, this says that ## (\frac{a_1 + a_2} {2})(\frac{1} {b_1}\ + \frac{1} {b_2}) > \frac{a_1} {b_1} + \frac{a_2} {b_2} ##
2) Expanding gives ## \frac{a_1}{2b_1} + \frac{a_2}{2b_1} + \frac{a_1}{2b_2} + \frac{a_2}{2b_2} > \frac{a_1} {b_1} + \frac{a_2} {b_2} ##
3) Because ##a_2 > a_1##, we can replace ##a_2## with ##a_1 + x##, where x is a positive real number, and get ## \frac{a_1}{2b_1} + (\frac{a_1}{2b_1} + \frac{x}{2b_1}) + (\frac{a_2}{2b_2} - \frac{x}{2b_2}) + \frac{a_2}{2b_2} > \frac{a_1} {b_1} + \frac{a_2} {b_2} ##
4) Combining terms and rearranging, we get ##\frac{a_1} {b_1} + \frac{a_2} {b_2} + \frac{x}{2b_1} - \frac{x}{2b_2} > \frac{a_1} {b_1} + \frac{a_2} {b_2} ##
5) Since ## b_2 > b_1, \frac{x}{2b_1} - \frac{x}{2b_2} > 0##, and then the above equality is true.

With a base case of n = 2 proven, I will now use induction to generalize this result:

6) Assume the inequality is true for n-1: ##( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{a_i} {n-1}\ )( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1} {b_i}\ ) > \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{a_i} {b_i}\ ##
7) Setting z = ## \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} a_i\ ##, we can rewrite this as ##( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{z} {(n-1)b_i}\ ) > \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{a_i} {b_i}\ ##
8) Adding ## \frac{a_n} {b_n} ## to both sides gives ##( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{z} {(n-1)b_i}\ ) + \frac{a_n} {b_n} > \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{a_i} {b_i}\ ##
9) I will now make the following assumption: ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{z + a_n} {nb_i}\ ) > ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{z} {(n-1)b_i}\ ) + \frac{a_n} {b_n} > \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{a_i} {b_i}\ ##
By showing that the first term is greater than the second term, we can show that it is also greater than the third, and then we will be done (as the first term is another way of writing the first term in Theorem 1).

The rest is just algebra:

10) Changing denominators: ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{(n-1)(z + a_n)} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) > ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{nz} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) + \frac{n(n-1)a_n} {n(n-1)b_n} ##
11) Expanding the first term: ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{nz + na_n - z - a_n} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) + \frac{(n-1)(z + a_n)} {n(n-1)b_n} > ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{nz} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) + \frac{n(n-1)a_n} {n(n-1)b_n} ##
12) Rearranging: ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{nz + na_n - z - a_n} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) - ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{nz} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) > \frac{n(n-1)a_n} {n(n-1)b_n} - \frac{(n-1)(z + a_n)} {n(n-1)b_n} ##
13) The above becomes ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{na_n - z - a_n} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) > \frac{na_n - z - a_n} {nb_n} ##
14) Diving both sides by ## na_n - z - a_n ##: ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) > \frac{1} {nb_n} ##
15) Since ## b_{n-1} > b_{n-2} > ... > b_1 ##, ## ( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1} {n(n-1)b_i}\ ) > \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1} {n(n-1)b_{n-1}} = \frac{1} {nb_{n-1}} ##. Similary, ## \frac{1} {nb_{n-1}} > \frac{1} {nb_{n}} ##

Therefore, the inequality in step 14 is true, which means that the inequality in step 9 is true, which proves Theorem 1.
---------

This was my first attempt at a formal proof, so sorry for any mistakes! My questions:

1) Is this a valid proof? Are there any missing steps or mistakes?
2) Is there a simpler proof?
3) Has this inequality been noticed before? Are there any other related stuff I can read up on?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I didn't check each individual expression, but the general idea is right and the key steps look right as well.
If you replace the bi by their inverse (and require that those are in decreasing order), it is a common inequality. A nice homework problem for undergrads I guess.

It looks related to the problem "show that a/b+b/c+c/a >= 3".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K