Courses Advice on Becoming a Particle Phenomenologist

  • Thread starter Thread starter prkls
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
AI Thread Summary
Starting a master's in subatomic physics involves foundational courses in the first year, followed by specialization in the second year. For those interested in particle phenomenology, a focus on theoretical courses is recommended. Key courses to consider include Quantum Field Theory (QFT) 1 and 2, which are essential, along with particle physics and possibly nuclear physics. While detector instrumentation and accelerator physics are valuable, phenomenologists typically require only a basic understanding of experimental aspects. General relativity, while not directly applicable to particle phenomenology, can enhance overall physics comprehension. It's also advised to prepare a list of potential thesis advisors and seek their recommendations, fostering collaboration and support within the academic community.
prkls
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just started my masters in "subatomic physics". The first year is the standard grad courses (electrodynamics, quantum and classical physics, statistical physics, maths etc.). The second year is going to be the one where I'll be choosing to become a theorist or experimentalist and write my thesis.

I am interested in particle phenomenology so i guess i should go more into theoretical courses than experimental ones, right? Can someone in the field give me some advice?

Which 4 courses of these would some one need most to get into particle phenomenology? The courses are: qft 1 and 2, detector instrumentation 1 and 2, particle physics, nuclear physics, general relativity, astroparticle physics and cosmology, accelerator physics. Sorry for the long question and thanks for any answers in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should prepare a list of candidate advisors for your thesis. Find out which ones will have openings. Then ask them for their recommendations.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Choppy, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
You should be nice. You will want a lot of help from your peers. It's easier to get help if you also give help.
 
prkls said:
I just started my masters in "subatomic physics". The first year is the standard grad courses (electrodynamics, quantum and classical physics, statistical physics, maths etc.). The second year is going to be the one where I'll be choosing to become a theorist or experimentalist and write my thesis.

I am interested in particle phenomenology so i guess i should go more into theoretical courses than experimental ones, right? Can someone in the field give me some advice?

Which 4 courses of these would some one need most to get into particle phenomenology? The courses are: qft 1 and 2, detector instrumentation 1 and 2, particle physics, nuclear physics, general relativity, astroparticle physics and cosmology, accelerator physics. Sorry for the long question and thanks for any answers in advance
If you are more inclined towards theory, for sure you need QFT, QFT, and QFT. So QFT 1+2 is a must, I'd say. Then I'd study particle physics and maybe nuclear physics. The other courses I'd choose just by what interests you most.
 
Phenomenology is indeed considered as theory if you make a theory/experiment divide. Purely based on the course names: QFT 1, QFT 2 and particle physics sound like no-brainers there.

Nuclear physics and particle astrophysics sound like solid choices, depending on whether your interest is the Standard Model or physics beyond the Standard Model, respectively. The detector and accelerator courses sound great in theory, because in the end it is the experiment that counts. But my impression is that in practice the phenomenologists get away with very basic understanding of the experiments.

General relativity is in a bit special: It doesn't help you for particle phenomenology (or pretty much any field of physics), except maybe for a better understanding of special relativity. But it is one of the two theories in physics that change your perception of reality. Maybe even more than QM, because it is not so weird. So if you want to take that course just out of interest in physics, I think it is a very good pick.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top