Aesthetically pleasing formulae involving time?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasQuinn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulae Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of aesthetically pleasing scientific formulae involving time for an art project. Participants explore various formulae from physics that incorporate the concept of time, considering both their visual appeal and scientific significance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the time-energy uncertainty relation, $$\Delta E \cdot \Delta t \geqslant \dfrac{\hbar}{2}$$, as a metaphor for the uncertainty of life.
  • Another participant proposes the Schrödinger equation, emphasizing its connection to time.
  • A participant expresses interest in using geological strata and a tree to symbolize time, alongside the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
  • Discussion includes the idea that any physical formula could represent time since physics often deals with changes over time.
  • Newton's laws are mentioned as a foundational aspect of modern physics that could be visually represented.
  • One participant suggests creating a device with a gear ratio that reflects the time it takes for copper coins to corrode, linking the concept of time to a physical mechanism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various preferences for formulae and concepts, with no clear consensus on a single formula or approach. Multiple competing views and ideas remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its implications, while others explore the broader concept of time in physics without settling on specific definitions or interpretations.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the intersection of art and science, particularly those exploring themes of time in creative projects, may find this discussion relevant.

ThomasQuinn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I sincerely hope that I'm posting this in the right place and without violating any etiquette.

I've come here looking for opinions and suggestions from a community of people far more proficient in the field of physics than I am, with a topic that is probably a little unusual. The situation is as follows:

I've been asked to participate in an art project where I have been given a wall-mounted wooden box (roughly 24" high , 12" wide and 6" deep) in which I am to address, in a way of my choosing, the theme of time. I have developed an idea with three sections, and in the middle one I want to put, on a black background, a scientific formula (or possibly formulae) in which time plays a prominent part.

I've been looking at a number of physics articles relating to time in physics and have come across a handful of important formulae involving time, such as Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism and of course several formulae relating to spacetime by Albert Einstein and others. However, I am not especially well at home in serious physics to understand with any depth the meaning of such formulae about the complex mathematics underlying the universe, let alone to find specific formulae that are aesthetically pleasing as well as relevant to the subject.

So, I would like to ask for suggestions: could you suggest any formulae, in which time is an important part, that you find aesthetically pleasing (either because of scientific meaning/implications, or purely visually, or both)?

I am open to all suggestions and not adverse to learning a little more about physics on the side. If you've read all the way to here, thank you for indulging me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would only place a big hourglass in it, one that can be turned by spectators with black velvet as background. Maybe a bit too simple and probably the first thing that comes to mind, though. As a formula with time I like
$$
\Delta E \cdot \Delta t \geqslant \dfrac{\hbar}{2} \text{ or } \Delta E \cdot \Delta t \geqslant \dfrac{h}{4\pi}
$$
as a metaphor to the fundamental uncertainty of life.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThomasQuinn
Here's another. The famous Schrödinger equation t stands for time.

slask.png


But I would also like to see a picture of Devils Tower, and invite people to think about the time passed from when it was created below ground, until the present.

C1431949-1DD8-B71B-0B3410EF0BD07828.jpg
 

Attachments

  • slask.png
    slask.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 1,190
  • C1431949-1DD8-B71B-0B3410EF0BD07828.jpg
    C1431949-1DD8-B71B-0B3410EF0BD07828.jpg
    18.9 KB · Views: 1,097
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThomasQuinn
fresh_42 said:
I would only place a big hourglass in it, one that can be turned by spectators with black velvet as background. Maybe a bit too simple and probably the first thing that comes to mind, though. As a formula with time I like
$$
\Delta E \cdot \Delta t \geqslant \dfrac{\hbar}{2} \text{ or } \Delta E \cdot \Delta t \geqslant \dfrac{h}{4\pi}
$$
as a metaphor to the fundamental uncertainty of life.

Thanks for your reply! I've considered hourglasses in a number of ways, but I'm far from the only participant, and I'm afraid there will be a *lot* of hourglasses around...I'm intending to go with geological strata and a tree growing on the top stratum in the bottom section, identical copper coins in increasing states of corrosion at the top and would like one or more formulae in the middle section. The background is going to be black with scattered watch parts set in it.

I will admit that I had to resort to google a bit to come to some understanding of the formula you gave me. I understand that's the time-energy uncertainty relation, a concrete example of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which I seem to gather is an old problem in quantum physics. Is that correct?
 
anorlunda said:
Here's another. The famous Schrödinger equation t stands for time.

View attachment 222466

But I would also like to see a picture of Devils Tower, and invite people to think about the time passed from when it was created below ground, until the present.

View attachment 222468

Thank you for your suggestion. I had never seen Devils Tower before, that is one gorgeous and intriguing picture! I neglected to mention this in the opening post, but I am using geological strata in the bottom section of my object, so that is at least thinking in broadly the same direction. I am gratefully noting the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a single particle moving in an electric field (I sure hope I got that right...)
 
ThomasQuinn said:
Thanks for your reply! I've considered hourglasses in a number of ways, but I'm far from the only participant, and I'm afraid there will be a *lot* of hourglasses around...I'm intending to go with geological strata and a tree growing on the top stratum in the bottom section, identical copper coins in increasing states of corrosion at the top and would like one or more formulae in the middle section. The background is going to be black with scattered watch parts set in it.

I will admit that I had to resort to google a bit to come to some understanding of the formula you gave me. I understand that's the time-energy uncertainty relation, a concrete example of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which I seem to gather is an old problem in quantum physics. Is that correct?
I find it's the most basic principle of quantum physics, the fact that there is an inherent uncertainty to what we can measure (simultaneously). Either we measure the precise energy or the precise time, but not both in one measurement process.

If it is only about time, then basically every physical formula can be used, as physics is about the change of a quantity from one state to another, usually at different times. I thought for a moment about spacetime as topic, but as this is four dimensional, there is no proper realization, resp. image for it. They all are compromises in one way or another. Technically a Lagrange equation could make sense, as it is all around in physics:
$$
\dfrac{d}{dt} \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}-\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial {q}_i} = Q_i
$$
The most natural equation should be motion: either explicitly as parabola ##\vec{x}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\vec{a}\cdot t^2+\vec{v}_0\cdot t+\vec{x}_0## which can be drawn next to it, or more general as ##\dot{\vec{p}}=\vec{F}## or ##\dfrac{d\vec{p}}{dt}=\vec{F}##. So maybe Newton's laws can be taken, a kind of starting point of modern physics, a turning point in history.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThomasQuinn
Thank you for the explanation and the insightful suggestions. I have to admit, it appeals to me as an historian to involve Newton in this.
 
I don't know about equations but you could create a device that uses a crazy gear ratio so something revolves once every amount of time, the amount of time would be how long it takes for something to occur such as the length of time it takes for the copper coins to corrode.
I second the shrodinger equation however
 
Also when does this need to be done by, because I am wondering if I am a bit late to reply
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K