I Affine parameter and non-geodesic null curves

JimWhoKnew
Messages
224
Reaction score
121
TL;DR Summary
Is there a sensible way to define an affine parameter for non-geodesic null curves?
Consider the curve (thanks to SE) in flat spacetime, given in Cartesian coordinates by$$x^μ(λ)=\left(λ , R\cos\frac{\lambda⁡}{R} , R\sin\frac{\lambda}{⁡R} ,0\right)$$where ##~R~## is a positive constant. At each point$$\dot x^\mu \dot x_\mu=0$$so it is a null curve but not a geodesic (not a straight line). It also satisfies$$\ddot x^\mu \dot x_\mu=0 \quad .$$If I got the calculation right, it turns out that for any reparametrization ##~\lambda'~## , where ##~\lambda'(\lambda)~## is an arbitrary monotonic function, ##~\dot x^\mu \dot x_\mu=\ddot x^\mu \dot x_\mu=0~## holds in this particular case (dots here w.r.t. ##~\lambda'~##).

Is there a sensible way in which we can define an affine parameter for non-geodesic null curves like this, such that certain parametrizations are affine while others are not?

Edit: (We have criteria for parameters to "be affine" in the cases of timelike/spacelike curves and null geodesics. Is the non-geodesic null curve an exception?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the particular example in OP, I think that the time coordinate ##~t~## of the specific reference frame can be regarded as an affine parameter. Because of the symmetry (the Euclidean length traced in each uniform interval ##~\Delta t~## is the same).
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
9K
Back
Top