AFM: Question about building one

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Son of Ole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around building a homemade Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) for educational purposes, specifically aimed at demonstrating its functionality to undergraduate students and conducting basic surface scans. Participants explore the feasibility, resources, and potential challenges involved in such a project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about resources and feasibility for constructing a homemade AFM, emphasizing the need for it to be functional yet not state-of-the-art.
  • Another participant recalls having seen information on building an AFM but cannot remember the specifics, suggesting a search through past issues of Scientific American.
  • A participant suggests using a cantilever sensor for simplicity, noting that shear-force sensors require more complex electronics. They describe the need for a laser to measure cantilever flexure and a micropositioner for proper positioning.
  • The same participant estimates that assembling the device could take a few weeks to a month, depending on the complexity of the setup and the availability of software like Labview.
  • Another participant expresses interest in undertaking this project for their senior thesis and seeks information on potential problems they might encounter, indicating a commitment of 20-30 hours per week over three months.
  • A participant provides links to companies that sell AFMs and additional online resources, including educational materials and research papers related to AFM technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the specifics of building a homemade AFM, and multiple viewpoints regarding the approach and resources remain. The discussion includes both suggestions for methods and requests for further information, indicating ongoing exploration rather than settled conclusions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of experience and knowledge regarding the construction of AFMs, and there are uncertainties about the engineering requirements and potential challenges, such as sensitivity to vibrations and the complexity of software integration.

Son of Ole
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey all. I'm not sure of the best forum to post this in, so I am putting it here.

I was wondering if anyone knows anything about or any resources for building a "homemade" AFM?

It wouldn't need to be state-of-the-art or even all that good. Just good enough to show undergrads how they work and do some basic surface scans.

What kind of time and resources would it take? Anybody done this on this forum?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Believe it or not, I think that I remember seeing something about this somewhere. Can't for the life of me remember where or when. If it comes to mind, I'll let you know. (Maybe snoop through back-issues of Scientific American.)
 
The simplest way would probably be using a cantilever sensor (normal-force sensor), as shear-force sensors require complex electronics.

Typically you measure the flexure of a cantilever using a laser bounced off the cantilever arm. You would also need a micropositioner of some sort to position the cantilever correctly (nothing too fancy though). On top of this you will need a computer and the appropriate software, such as Labview to record the data. You may also want something with a precisely known morphology (topology) to test and calibrate the device such as a phase mask or a diffraction grating.

How long will it take time wise? Well that depends on the degree of assembly of the cantilever sensor system. You can buy 'plug and play' type systems for Academic purposes, but they are expensive. If you need to mount everything yourself, it may take a little longer. It will also depend on whether Labview software is readily available and to what degree you will need to modify existing VIs (and how competent you are with Labview too I guess).

I would guess maybe a couple of weeks to a month of solid playing around to get the device working, maybe a bit less if the instrument is particularly robust (I have never built one of these myself, so I'm not sure how sensitive the engineering requirements are, how affected it will be from vibrations for example).

If I come across any resources for this type of instrument, I'll be sure to post them.

Claude.
 
Last edited:
Further info?

Thanks for your replies Claude and Danger.

Anyone else know of any specific resources?

I am considering doing it for my senior thesis, but would like to know the full range of problems I would run into. I would have three months of about 20-30 hours a week to devote to it, give or take.

Thanks
 
Here are a few companies that sell AFMs, most have websites that have a bit of info about AFM and usually a few links.

Veeco - http://www.veeco.com/
NT-MDT - http://www.ntmdt.ru/
Nanonics - http://www.nanonics.co.il/index.php?goto=bep

Google-ing AFM yielded the following as well

http://stm2.nrl.navy.mil/how-afm/how-afm.html
http://www.chembio.uoguelph.ca/educmat/chm729/afm/firstpag.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_force_microscope
http://spm.phy.bris.ac.uk/techniques/AFM/

Hopefully that should get you started. There is also a ton of papers on AFM in various research journals - Ultramicroscopy and Review of Scientific Instruments tend to be the best when it comes to technical stuff.

Claude.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K