AI vs. German Physics Olympiad

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
GPT-4o and the o1-preview model have demonstrated superior performance in physics competitions, surpassing even top human participants. Cheating using AI tools like ChatGPT has been reported, with some students achieving high scores in competitions such as the British Physics Olympiad. In some educational environments, there appears to be a lax attitude towards cheating, especially in non-critical assessments, leading to a culture where AI assistance is normalized. Instances of students using smartphones to access AI during tests have been noted, often without repercussions from teachers. The overall trend suggests that AI is significantly impacting academic integrity in competitive settings.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,400
Reaction score
2,763
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v18/147

"GPT-4o outperformed the average human participant, and the newer o1-preview model did even better." Note that average students don't bother to enter the Olympiad. These are the better/best students.
 
  • Informative
Likes TensorCalculus
Physics news on Phys.org
Hornbein said:
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v18/147

"GPT-4o outperformed the average human participant, and the newer o1-preview model did even better." Note that average students don't bother to enter the Olympiad. These are the better/best students.
Not surprised: I know someone who used ChatGPT to cheat on the British physics olympiad and got an exceptionally high score.
It's a nightmare (but also very impressive)
Google's AlphaGeometry AI was able to do better on IMO geometry problems than almost all of the participants. Crazy!
 
TensorCalculus said:
I know someone who used ChatGPT to cheat on the British physics olympiad and got an exceptionally high score.
Did they get caught? Back when I was in university (many years ago), if you knew someone cheated on an exam and did not turn them in, you could be considered just as guilty of cheating and face the same consequences.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes TensorCalculus and weirdoguy
berkeman said:
Did they get caught? Back when I was in university (many years ago), if you knew someone cheated on an exam and did not turn them in, you could be considered just as guilty of cheating and face the same consequences.
Don't know. Everyone in our year knew that they used ChatGPT they sort of turned it into a year-wide joke.

The test didn't matter anyway: they simply made all of us do it "for fun" and our score made no difference whatsoever to anything... apart from getting a certificate. I honestly don't think the school would have cared if someone told them that the kid cheated with ChatGPT...
They're really (overly) lax about cheating here, unless it's on an important test (e.g. GCSEs). They certainly don't have a rule like that - that's a new one for me!
 
AFAIK not even pocket calculators are allowed in those olympiads. How did they do it?
 
The school literally does not care because they were making a bunch of kids do a physics challenge which is meant to be for people years older than them, "for fun"...
The story is that they just used their phone under the table, and the teacher, if they did see, didn't mind.
We are allowed calculators though!

EDIT/ADD: I just realised, when checking grade boundaries to quantify just how well she did, it wasn't the British Physics Olympiad that we did, we did the easier version, The Physics Challenge. A merit is 20/50 and that girl got 42/50 just using ChatGPT.
 
Last edited:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Back
Top