AlgebraicNumber to simple number in Mathematica

  • Context: Mathematica 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zplot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
zplot
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

From some matrix operations I get "AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]" as output.

I need to get i/4 and I don't know how. If I write "N[AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]]",
I get 0. + 0.25 i but it is not what I want neither. I would like to get just i/4 as output.

Can anybody help?
Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zplot said:
From some matrix operations I get "AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]" as output.

I need to get i/4 and I don't know how.

That seems odd because this
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/AlgebraicNumber.html
under More Information says
"AlgebraicNumber objects representing integers or rational numbers are automatically reduced to explicit integer or rational form."
Perhaps that implies that complex are not automatically reduced to explicit form.

What do you get with Im[AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]]

What do you get with Simplify[AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]]
 
Thank you Bill.

With
Im[AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]]
I get
Im[AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]]
and with
Simplify[AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]]
I get
AlgebraicNumber[-4 I, {0, -(1/16)}]

so no solution yet.

Any other idea?

Thanks a lot.
 
Unfortunately I can't test that for you at the moment and that severely restricts what I can find.

You might post it here
http://forums.wolfram.com/student-support/discussions/4/

This is very very odd and looks like a limitation that should not be there.
The URL I posted previously seemed like it said I am should have worked.